Suppr超能文献

用于生成治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)报告的语音识别系统评估

Evaluation of a voice recognition system for generation of therapeutic ERCP reports.

作者信息

Massey B T, Geenen J E, Hogan W J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 Nov-Dec;37(6):617-20. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70866-3.

Abstract

We evaluated a computerized report-generating system using voice recognition technology (EndoSpeak) for producing therapeutic ERCP reports. For 30 consecutive ERCP cases, reports using both EndoSpeak and standard dictation were generated at the end of the procedure. The cases were scored for overall difficulty and the number of component procedures performed. The time to generate a report with EndoSpeak was significantly longer than with dictation (10.0 +/- 2.9 (SD) min vs. 6.5 +/- 1.6 min, p less than 0.0001), and this difference was greater for more lengthy reports (r = 0.85, p less than 0.001). The procedure difficulty score and the number of component procedures were both significant predictors of the physician's report generation time for EndoSpeak and dictation. Dictated reports were judged to have a higher information content than EndoSpeak reports for 90% of the cases (p less than 0.00001). Several specific difficulties were encountered with the EndoSpeak software. Although EndoSpeak offers promise, substantial software modifications will be required before this system can become competitive with dictation for therapeutic ERCP reports.

摘要

我们评估了一种使用语音识别技术(EndoSpeak)生成治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)报告的计算机化报告生成系统。连续选取30例ERCP病例,在操作结束时分别使用EndoSpeak和标准口述方式生成报告。对病例的总体难度和所执行的组成操作数量进行评分。使用EndoSpeak生成报告的时间显著长于口述方式(10.0±2.9(标准差)分钟对6.5±1.6分钟,p<0.0001),且对于更长的报告,这种差异更大(r = 0.85,p<0.001)。操作难度评分和组成操作数量都是EndoSpeak和口述方式下医生生成报告时间的显著预测因素。在90%的病例中,口述报告被判定比EndoSpeak报告具有更高的信息含量(p<0.00001)。使用EndoSpeak软件时遇到了一些特定困难。尽管EndoSpeak有前景,但在该系统能够与口述方式竞争生成治疗性ERCP报告之前,还需要对软件进行大量修改。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验