• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于减少生态偏差的混合模型。

A hybrid model for reducing ecological bias.

作者信息

Salway Ruth, Wakefield Jon

机构信息

Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

出版信息

Biostatistics. 2008 Jan;9(1):1-17. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm022. Epub 2007 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1093/biostatistics/kxm022
PMID:17575322
Abstract

A major drawback of epidemiological ecological studies, in which the association between area-level summaries of risk and exposure is used to make inference about individual risk, is the difficulty in characterizing within-area variability in exposure and confounder variables. To avoid ecological bias, samples of individual exposure/confounder data within each area are required. Unfortunately, these may be difficult or expensive to obtain, particularly if large samples are required. In this paper, we propose a new approach suitable for use with small samples. We combine a Bayesian nonparametric Dirichlet process prior with an estimating functions' approach and show that this model gives a compromise between 2 previously described methods. The method is investigated using simulated data, and a practical illustration is provided through an analysis of lung cancer mortality and residential radon exposure in counties of Minnesota. We conclude that we require good quality prior information about the exposure/confounder distributions and a large between- to within-area variability ratio for an ecological study to be feasible using only small samples of individual data.

摘要

流行病学生态研究的一个主要缺点是,利用风险和暴露的区域层面汇总数据之间的关联来推断个体风险时,难以描述区域内暴露和混杂变量的变异性。为避免生态偏倚,需要每个区域内个体暴露/混杂数据的样本。不幸的是,获取这些样本可能困难或昂贵,尤其是在需要大样本的情况下。在本文中,我们提出一种适用于小样本的新方法。我们将贝叶斯非参数狄利克雷过程先验与估计函数方法相结合,表明该模型在之前描述的两种方法之间取得了折衷。使用模拟数据对该方法进行了研究,并通过分析明尼苏达州各县的肺癌死亡率和住宅氡暴露提供了一个实际例证。我们得出结论,对于仅使用个体数据小样本的生态研究而言,要可行的话,我们需要关于暴露/混杂分布的高质量先验信息以及较大的区域间与区域内变异性比率。

相似文献

1
A hybrid model for reducing ecological bias.一种用于减少生态偏差的混合模型。
Biostatistics. 2008 Jan;9(1):1-17. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm022. Epub 2007 Jun 16.
2
Health-exposure modeling and the ecological fallacy.健康暴露建模与生态谬误。
Biostatistics. 2006 Jul;7(3):438-55. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj017. Epub 2006 Jan 20.
3
Bayesian modelling of lung cancer risk and bitumen fume exposure adjusted for unmeasured confounding by smoking.针对吸烟导致的未测量混杂因素进行调整后,对肺癌风险和沥青烟暴露进行贝叶斯建模。
Occup Environ Med. 2009 Aug;66(8):502-8. doi: 10.1136/oem.2008.042606. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
4
Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.长期暴露于交通相关空气污染对荷兰呼吸道和心血管疾病死亡率的影响:荷兰长期队列空气污染研究(NLCS-AIR研究)
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009 Mar(139):5-71; discussion 73-89.
5
On the potential of measurement error to induce differential bias on odds ratio estimates: an example from radon epidemiology.关于测量误差对优势比估计值产生差异偏差的可能性:来自氡流行病学的一个例子。
Stat Med. 2002 Nov 15;21(21):3261-78. doi: 10.1002/sim.1252.
6
Modeling disease incidence data with spatial and spatio temporal dirichlet process mixtures.使用空间和时空狄利克雷过程混合模型对疾病发病率数据进行建模。
Biom J. 2008 Feb;50(1):29-42. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200610375.
7
[The precautionary principle applied to lung cancer risk caused by residential radon].[应用于住宅氡气所致肺癌风险的预防原则]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2002 Apr;50(2):147-57.
8
Case-control study of radon and lung cancer in New Jersey.新泽西州氡与肺癌的病例对照研究。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;128(2):169-79. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncm330. Epub 2007 Jul 4.
9
Linkage failures in ecological studies.生态研究中的连锁失败。
World Health Stat Q. 1995;48(2):78-84.
10
Population attributable fraction for lung cancer due to residential radon in Switzerland and Germany.瑞士和德国因住宅氡气导致的肺癌人群归因分数。
Health Phys. 2008 Aug;95(2):179-89. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000309769.55126.03.

引用本文的文献

1
Combining individual and aggregated data to investigate the role of socioeconomic disparities on cancer burden in Italy.结合个体和汇总数据研究意大利社会经济差异对癌症负担的作用。
Stat Med. 2020 Jan 15;39(1):26-44. doi: 10.1002/sim.8392. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
2
Spatial Aggregation and the Ecological Fallacy.空间聚集与生态谬误
Chapman Hall CRC Handb Mod Stat Methods. 2010;2010:541-558. doi: 10.1201/9781420072884-c30.
3
Incorporating spatial variability within epidemiological studies of environmental exposures.将空间变异性纳入环境暴露的流行病学研究中。
Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2013 Jun;22:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2012.03.011.
4
Lung cancer mortality and radon concentration in a chronically exposed neighborhood in Chihuahua, Mexico: a geospatial analysis.墨西哥奇瓦瓦州一个长期暴露地区的肺癌死亡率与氡浓度:一项地理空间分析
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:935380. doi: 10.1155/2014/935380. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
5
Colon and rectal cancer incidence and water trihalomethane concentrations in New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州结肠癌和直肠癌发病率与水中三卤甲烷浓度
BMC Cancer. 2014 Jun 17;14:445. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-445.
6
On ecological studies: a short communication.论生态研究:一个短通讯。
Dose Response. 2011;9(4):497-501. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.10-046.Hart. Epub 2011 Jan 7.