Berbiglia V A
University of Texas Health Science Center, School of Nursing, San Antonio 78284-7948.
J Adv Nurs. 1991 Oct;16(10):1158-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1991.tb01523.x.
This case study provides a descriptive analysis of administrative, faculty and student perspectives on use of and satisfaction with Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory (SCDNT) in one baccalaureate nursing programme's curriculum elements of (a) goals and objectives, (b) materials, (c) content, (d) nursing foci, and (e) evaluation. The need for such an analysis is indicated by the wide acceptance and use of the SCDNT in education and the absence of any similar study. Curriculum is conceptualized in the context of the Curriculum Model for the Study of Schooling, USA. Administrative representatives included the dean of nursing, the director of the nursing programme, the two curriculum chairpersons and the programme co-ordinator. The faculty and students from two specific courses provided the instructional and experiential perspectives. Data collection included structured personal interviews and document review. The investigator developed from the ideal perspective of the literature (Orem and related scholars) criteria for judging if the SCDNT indeed was implemented in the curriculum elements and the satisfaction with the theory. The faculty perspective was the most similar to the ideal, and the administration's was the least similar. Student and faculty perceptions were extremely similar. All three perspectives were in near agreement with the ideal on the use of the SCDNT in: goals and objectives, content and evaluation. A major inconsistency was found. Each perspective expressed varying interpretations of the nursing process. Pronounced patterns were examined, and implications for nursing education were stated.
本案例研究对一所护理学学士课程的课程要素(a)目标、(b)材料、(c)内容、(d)护理重点以及(e)评估中,行政人员、教师和学生对奥瑞姆自理缺陷护理理论(SCDNT)的使用情况及满意度进行了描述性分析。鉴于SCDNT在教育领域得到广泛认可和应用,且尚无任何类似研究,因此有必要进行这样的分析。课程是在美国学校教育研究课程模型的背景下进行概念化的。行政代表包括护理学院院长、护理项目主任、两位课程主席和项目协调员。来自两门特定课程的教师和学生提供了教学和实践方面的观点。数据收集包括结构化的个人访谈和文件审查。研究者从文献(奥瑞姆及相关学者)的理想视角出发,制定了判断SCDNT是否确实在课程要素中得以实施以及对该理论满意度的标准。教师的观点与理想最为相似,而行政人员的观点与理想最不相似。学生和教师的看法极为相似。在SCDNT在目标、内容和评估方面的使用上,所有三个观点与理想几乎一致。发现了一个主要的不一致之处。每个观点对护理过程都有不同的解释。研究了明显的模式,并阐述了对护理教育的启示。