DAS P K, Vanamail P
Vector Control Research Centre, Pondicherry, India.
Epidemiol Infect. 2008 Apr;136(4):520-4. doi: 10.1017/S0950268807008953. Epub 2007 Jun 20.
Lymphatic filariasis continues to cause severe morbidity and economic loss. The World Health Assembly (WHA) has passed a resolution to eliminate this disease by 2020. The major thrust of the elimination strategy is interrupting transmission by anti-parasitic treatment of entire communities. However, both vector density and community microfilaria load (CMFL) influence the intensity of transmission. Therefore, using a logistic regression approach a relationship has been established between the Risk of Infection Index (RII), vector density and CMFL. The present analysis indicates that there is no risk of transmission as long as the CMFL is maintained below 5 microfilaria (mf)/60 mm3 and the vector density per man-hour (MHD) is 25 and CMFL is <5 mf/60 mm3. In situations where CMFL is very high, parasitic control by mass administration may be cost effective in interrupting transmission. But at lower level of CMFL (<4 mf) and higher level of vector density it might be more cost effective to use vector control methods. A RII value <0.2 is considered to be the threshold for confirming interruption of transmission. Thus, the relationship has been depicted in the form of a probability matrix, which could be used for selecting an appropriate control strategy.
淋巴丝虫病继续导致严重的发病情况和经济损失。世界卫生大会(WHA)已通过一项决议,要在2020年消除这种疾病。消除战略的主要重点是通过对整个社区进行抗寄生虫治疗来阻断传播。然而,病媒密度和社区微丝蚴负荷(CMFL)都会影响传播强度。因此,采用逻辑回归方法,在感染风险指数(RII)、病媒密度和CMFL之间建立了一种关系。目前的分析表明,只要CMFL维持在低于5条微丝蚴(mf)/60立方毫米,且每人每小时病媒密度(MHD)为25且CMFL<5 mf/60立方毫米,就不存在传播风险。在CMFL非常高的情况下,通过群体给药进行寄生虫控制在阻断传播方面可能具有成本效益。但在CMFL较低水平(<4 mf)且病媒密度较高时,使用病媒控制方法可能更具成本效益。RII值<0.2被认为是确认传播阻断的阈值。因此,这种关系已以概率矩阵的形式呈现,可用于选择合适的控制策略。