Moon M C, Morales J P, Greenberg Roy K
Department of Vascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Semin Vasc Surg. 2007 Jun;20(2):97-107. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2007.04.007.
Aneurysms involving the ascending aorta and arch have been historically treated with open surgical techniques requiring cardiopulmonary bypass and, in cases involving the aortic arch, utilizing deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. The reported rates of mortality range from 0% to 16.5% for surgery addressing ascending aorta and arch pathology, and stroke rates of 2% to 18%. These statistics highlight the invasiveness of these procedures. Continued development and evolution of endovascular stent-grafts has allowed for the application of endovascular interventions in the proximal descending thoracic aorta and visceral aortic segments. Based on early experiences, attention has been focused on the ascending aorta and aortic arch, where unique challenges exist and have been addressed by both extra-anatomic bypass and novel methods incorporating branched and fenestrated devices. Device evolution, coupled with increased experience by the aortic interventionalist, has resulted in successful cases of endovascular management of every section of the aorta, including aortic valve replacement. However, these experiences have also been accompanied by significant complications. In this light, new endovascular endeavors must be considered in the context of conventional treatment options, hybrid procedures, and novel branched devices. Patient factors, such as specific anatomic issues, comorbid diseases, and functional levels must play an important role in the determination of therapeutic options. Ultimately, a clinician who understands the disease and is familiar with all treatment options (interventional, medical, and open surgical) will be best suited to provide care for the aortic patient. Finally, as with any assessment of interventional strategies, rigorous follow-up and serial imaging are essential.
累及升主动脉和主动脉弓的动脉瘤,历史上一直采用需要体外循环的开放手术技术进行治疗,对于累及主动脉弓的病例,则采用深低温循环停搏技术。报道显示,针对升主动脉和主动脉弓病变的手术死亡率在0%至16.5%之间,中风发生率在2%至18%之间。这些统计数据凸显了这些手术的侵入性。血管内支架移植物的不断发展和演进,使得血管内介入技术能够应用于降主动脉近端和内脏主动脉段。基于早期经验,人们将注意力集中在升主动脉和主动脉弓,这里存在独特的挑战,已通过解剖外旁路以及采用分支和开窗装置的新方法得以解决。器械的改进,再加上主动脉介入医生经验的增加,已成功实现了对主动脉各节段的血管内治疗,包括主动脉瓣置换。然而,这些经验也伴随着严重的并发症。有鉴于此,新的血管内治疗方法必须在传统治疗方案、杂交手术和新型分支装置的背景下加以考虑。患者因素,如特定的解剖问题、合并疾病和功能水平,在治疗方案的确定中必须发挥重要作用。最终,一名了解疾病并熟悉所有治疗选择(介入、药物和开放手术)的临床医生最适合为主动脉疾病患者提供治疗。最后,与任何介入策略评估一样,严格的随访和系列影像学检查至关重要。