Suppr超能文献

根管治疗后牙齿上全冠、固定义齿及带桩核悬臂固定义齿的长期存留情况

Long-term survival of complete crowns, fixed dental prostheses, and cantilever fixed dental prostheses with posts and cores on root canal-treated teeth.

作者信息

De Backer Hein, Van Maele Georges, Decock Veerle, Van den Berghe Linda

机构信息

Centre for Special Care, PaeCaMed Research, Unit of Gnathology and Temporomandibular Disorders, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2007 May-Jun;20(3):229-34.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study investigated the long-term survival of posts and cores on root canal-treated (RCT) teeth restored with complete crowns, fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), 3-unit FDPs, and cantilever FDPs (C-FDPs) made over a period of 16 to 20 years in an undergraduate clinic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Complete treatment and follow-up records of 1,037 complete crowns, 134 three-unit FDPs, 322 FDPs, and 168 C-FDPs were available for analysis. All RCT teeth studied had a post-and-core buildup. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to evaluate the different types of fixed restorations.

RESULTS

For complete crowns, the estimated survival rates at year 18 were 74.9% for the vital group and 79.4% for the RCT group (P = .602). For 3-unit FDPs, the survival rate at year 20 was 83.2% for the vital group and 60.5% for the RCT group (P = .108). For the FDPs, the survival rate at year 20 was 77.4% for the vital group, while for the RCT group with at least 1 RCT abutment, the survival rate was 56.7% (P = .002). For C-FDPs with vital abutments, the survival rate was 73.5% at year 16, while for the RCT group with at least 1 RCT abutment, the survival rate was 52.3% at year 18 (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no statistically significant difference in the long-term survival of complete crowns on vital abutments versus post-and-core complete crowns or in the survival of 3-unit FDPs on vital abutments versus those with at least 1 RCT abutment. For FDPs with more than 3 units and C-FDPs, the use of a post-and-core abutment led to significantly more failures.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了在本科诊所制作的全冠、固定义齿(FDP)、3单位FDP和悬臂固定义齿(C-FDP)修复的根管治疗(RCT)牙齿上桩核的长期存活率,这些修复体制作时间为16至20年。

材料与方法

有1037个全冠、134个3单位FDP、322个FDP和168个C-FDP的完整治疗及随访记录可供分析。所有研究的RCT牙齿均进行了桩核修复。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线评估不同类型的固定修复体。

结果

对于全冠,活髓组在第18年的估计存活率为74.9%,RCT组为79.4%(P = 0.602)。对于3单位FDP,活髓组在第20年的存活率为83.2%,RCT组为60.5%(P = 0.108)。对于FDP,活髓组在第20年的存活率为77.4%,而对于至少有1个RCT基牙的RCT组,存活率为56.7%(P = 0.002)。对于有活髓基牙的C-FDP,在第16年的存活率为73.5%,而对于至少有1个RCT基牙的RCT组,在第18年的存活率为52.3%(P < 0.01)。

结论

活髓基牙上的全冠与桩核全冠的长期存活率或活髓基牙上的3单位FDP与至少有1个RCT基牙的FDP的存活率之间无统计学显著差异。对于超过3单位的FDP和C-FDP,使用桩核基牙导致的失败显著更多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验