Doz Yves L, Kosonen Mikko
Global Technology and Innovation at Insead, Fontainebleau, France.
Harv Bus Rev. 2007 Jun;85(6):98-104, 142.
What makes a company strategically agile--able to alter its strategies and business models rapidly in response to major changes in its market space, and to do so repeatedly without major trauma? Three years of in-depth case research on a dozen large companies worldwide showed the authors that one key factor is a new leadership model at the top. Senior executives at agile companies assume collective rather than individual responsibility for results. They build interdependencies among units and divisions, motivating themselves to engage with one another, and carefully manage their dealings to promote collaboration that is frequent, intense, informal, open, and focused on shared issues and the long term. Challenges to conventional thinking are encouraged. This is the new deal, and it's not easy to strike, because it requires executives to act in ways that are far from comfortable. After all, the corporate ladder at most firms favors independent types with a deep need for power and autonomy. At executive meetings, disagreement is suppressed or expressed passive-aggressively, eroding any real sense of belonging to a team. Switching to the new deal almost always requires a huge shift in the company's culture, values, and norms of interaction. The authors describe three approaches to making the shift: Executives can be given formal responsibility not for a business unit but for different stages in the company's value chain. This worked well for SAP, which has a relatively focused business portfolio. When a company's portfolio is less uniform, like Nokia's, business and functional units can be organized to crisscross on a matrix. And when a company is widely diverse, like easyGroup, it can emphasize the learning opportunities that units with common business models may share.
是什么让一家公司具备战略敏捷性——能够迅速改变其战略和商业模式,以应对市场空间的重大变化,并能反复如此且不会遭受重大创伤?作者对全球十几家大公司进行了为期三年的深入案例研究,结果表明,一个关键因素是高层的新型领导模式。敏捷型公司的高管对结果承担集体而非个人责任。他们在各部门之间建立相互依存关系,促使自己相互协作,并谨慎管理他们的往来,以促进频繁、紧密、非正式、开放且专注于共同问题和长期目标的合作。鼓励对传统思维提出挑战。这是一种新的模式,达成并不容易,因为它要求高管们以极不自在的方式行事。毕竟,大多数公司的晋升阶梯青睐那些极度渴望权力和自主权的独立型人才。在高管会议上,不同意见要么被压制,要么以消极攻击的方式表达出来,这削弱了任何真正的团队归属感。转向新模式几乎总是需要公司的文化、价值观和互动规范发生巨大转变。作者描述了实现这种转变的三种方法:高管可以被赋予的正式职责不是针对某个业务部门,而是针对公司价值链的不同阶段。这对业务组合相对集中的思爱普公司很有效。当公司的业务组合不那么统一时,比如诺基亚,业务和职能部门可以按照矩阵方式交叉组织。而当公司业务非常多元化时,比如易集团,它可以强调具有共同商业模式部门可能共享的学习机会。