Suppr超能文献

一份用于评估神经精神疾病患者认知功能的照料者调查问卷的开发与验证

The development and validation of a carer questionnaire to assess cognitive function in neuropsychiatric patients.

作者信息

Randhawa Sharan, Walterfang Mark, Miller Kathryn, Scholes Amelia, Mocellin Ramon, Velakoulis Dennis

机构信息

Neuropsychiatry Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, and Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, University of Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2007 Jul;63(1):93-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.02.004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The carer history is an integral part of the assessment of patients with cognitive impairment. We aimed to develop a comprehensive yet concise carer questionnaire, the CogRisk, which captures actuarial risk variables for cognitive impairment in addition to key symptoms suggestive of cognitive decline in a number of cognitive domains, and to then assess its validity and reliability in a neuropsychiatric population.

METHOD

Carers of patients assessed for cognitive impairment completed the CogRisk, and patients were clinically assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Neuropsychiatry Unit COGnitive assessment tool (NUCOG). Reliability was assessed using test-retest and interrater measures and measures of internal consistency. Construct and concurrent validity was assessed using correlation between total and subscale scores on the CogRisk, total scores on the NUCOG and MMSE, and subscale scores on the NUCOG. Predictive validity was determined using measures of sensitivity and specificity and using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methods.

RESULTS

The CogRisk was completed by all carers in less than 10 min. The total CogRisk score correlated significantly with total MMSE and NUCOG scores (r=-0.511 and -0.563, respectively) and remained highly significant when age and education were controlled for. Internal consistency of CogRisk items was high (alpha=0.943). Intrarater reliability of the CogRisk was high with an intraclass correlation coefficient of .978 (P<.001), and interrater reliability between carers was also high at 0.868 (P<.05). Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of dementia were .70 and .73, respectively, with area under the ROC curve not significantly different from that of the MMSE or NUCOG.

CONCLUSION

The CogRisk is a brief carer-rated tool of a patient's cognitive functioning developed for use within a neuropsychiatric setting. It exhibited good concurrent validity, internal consistency, and interrater and intrarater reliability. The CogRisk also demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity for dementia. The CogRisk provides carer information, which complements the clinical assessment and can be used to focus on direct carer interview.

摘要

目的

照顾者病史是认知障碍患者评估的一个重要组成部分。我们旨在开发一份全面而简洁的照顾者问卷,即CogRisk,该问卷除了能捕捉多个认知领域中提示认知衰退的关键症状外,还能获取认知障碍的精算风险变量,然后在神经精神科人群中评估其有效性和可靠性。

方法

对接受认知障碍评估患者的照顾者进行CogRisk问卷调查,同时使用简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和神经精神科认知评估工具(NUCOG)对患者进行临床评估。通过重测法、评分者间测量法和内部一致性测量法评估可靠性。通过CogRisk总分与子量表得分、NUCOG和MMSE总分以及NUCOG子量表得分之间的相关性评估结构效度和同时效度。使用敏感性和特异性测量法以及受试者工作特征(ROC)方法确定预测效度。

结果

所有照顾者完成CogRisk问卷的时间均少于10分钟。CogRisk总分与MMSE和NUCOG总分显著相关(分别为r = -0.511和-0.563),在控制年龄和教育程度后仍具有高度显著性。CogRisk项目的内部一致性较高(α = 0.943)。CogRisk的评分者内信度较高,组内相关系数为0.978(P <.001),照顾者之间的评分者间信度也较高,为0.868(P <.05)。检测痴呆的敏感性和特异性分别为0.70和0.73,ROC曲线下面积与MMSE或NUCOG无显著差异。

结论

CogRisk是一种为神经精神科环境开发的、由照顾者评定患者认知功能的简短工具。它具有良好的同时效度、内部一致性以及评分者间和评分者内信度。CogRisk对痴呆也具有良好的敏感性和特异性。CogRisk提供了照顾者信息,可补充临床评估,并可用于指导直接的照顾者访谈。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验