Kim Su-Young, Lim Jung-A, Choi Jun-Sub, Choi Eung-Chil, Joo Choun-Ki
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Cornea. 2007 Jul;26(6):720-5. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3180515251.
To compare the bacterial susceptibility and corneal epithelial toxicity of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin in the human corneal epithelial cells (HCECs).
We used 2 types of strains, ie, American Type Culture Collection strains and resistant strains. The former included Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Serratia marcescens, The latter were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; methicillin-resistant, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus sp.; and ciprofloxacin-resistant P. aeruginosa. The HCECs were incubated with each bacterial population for 1 hour and exposed to both antibiotics for 1 hour. The colony-forming units of viable bacteria per well were expressed as base 10 logarithms. To determine corneal epithelial toxicity, we exposed the HCECs to each antibiotic agent, and the viable epithelial cells were quantified by the MTT assay. We also observed the wound healing rate of injured HCECs cultured in each antibiotic agent for 24 hours.
In bacterial susceptibility testing of antibiotics, levofloxacin was less effective for Serratia marcescens than moxifloxacin (P < 0.05). However, both moxifloxacin and levofloxacin showed the same efficacy against Gram-positive bacteria, P. aeruginosa, and resistant strains (P > 0.05). Moxifloxacin showed a higher toxicity than levofloxacin when the HCECs were exposed to the respective antibiotics for 2 and 24 hours (P < 0.05). The moxifloxacin inhibited the effect of wound healing in HCEC injury, but levofloxacin did not (P < 0.05).
There was no significant difference in antibiotic effects between moxifloxacin and levofloxacin on most bacterial strains, except for Serratia marcescens. On the other hand, levofloxacin seemed to be safer than moxifloxacin in HCECs.
比较左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星在人角膜上皮细胞(HCECs)中的细菌敏感性和角膜上皮毒性。
我们使用了2种菌株,即美国典型培养物保藏中心菌株和耐药菌株。前者包括金黄色葡萄球菌、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌和粘质沙雷氏菌,后者为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌;耐甲氧西林、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌属;以及耐环丙沙星铜绿假单胞菌。将HCECs与每种细菌群体孵育1小时,然后暴露于两种抗生素中1小时。每孔中活细菌的菌落形成单位以10为底的对数表示。为了确定角膜上皮毒性,我们将HCECs暴露于每种抗生素中,通过MTT法对活上皮细胞进行定量。我们还观察了在每种抗生素中培养24小时的受损HCECs的伤口愈合率。
在抗生素的细菌敏感性测试中,左氧氟沙星对粘质沙雷氏菌的效果不如莫西沙星(P < 0.05)。然而,莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星对革兰氏阳性菌、铜绿假单胞菌和耐药菌株的疗效相同(P > 0.05)。当HCECs分别暴露于各自的抗生素2小时和24小时时,莫西沙星的毒性高于左氧氟沙星(P < 0.05)。莫西沙星抑制了HCEC损伤中的伤口愈合作用,但左氧氟沙星没有(P < 0.05)。
除粘质沙雷氏菌外,莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星对大多数细菌菌株的抗生素效果没有显著差异。另一方面,在HCECs中,左氧氟沙星似乎比莫西沙星更安全。