Hodges Brian
Wilson Centre for Research in Education, University of Toronto, Canada.
Med Teach. 2006 Dec;28(8):690-6. doi: 10.1080/01421590601102964.
We think of medical education as a process that moves novices from a state of incompetence to one of competence. This paper explores the idea that education may, at times, actually lead to incompetence as a result of over-emphasizing particular discourses that construct what competence is. This paper explores four discourses each with its own terminology and core conceptualizations of competence; each of which creates different roles for students and teachers. No one discourse is ideal and all drive teaching and assessment in particular ways. Sometimes these forms of teaching or assessment may inadvertently foster incompetence. In this paper I argue that, as with medical treatments, medical educators must pay more attention to the side-effects of the discourses that shape medical education.
我们将医学教育视为一个将新手从无能力状态转变为有能力状态的过程。本文探讨了这样一种观点,即由于过度强调构建能力概念的特定话语,教育有时实际上可能导致无能力。本文探讨了四种话语,每种话语都有其自己的术语和能力的核心概念;每种话语都为学生和教师创造了不同的角色。没有一种话语是理想的,所有话语都以特定方式推动教学和评估。有时这些教学或评估形式可能会无意中助长无能力。在本文中,我认为,与医疗治疗一样,医学教育工作者必须更加关注塑造医学教育的话语的副作用。