• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

海洋藻类:筛选强效抗菌剂。

Marine algae: screening for a potent antibacterial agent.

作者信息

Nair Ratish, Chabhadiya Rajesh, Chanda Sumitra

机构信息

Dept of Biosciences, Saurashtra University, Rajkot, Gujarat, 360 005, India.

出版信息

J Herb Pharmacother. 2007;7(1):73-86.

PMID:17594989
Abstract

This study was done to investigate the antimicrobial potentiality of the marine algae collected from different coastal regions of Gujarat and screened for the same. Twenty-six marine algae belonging to Rhodophyceae, Chlorophyceae and Phaeophyceae were screened for their potential antibacterial activity against five clinically important bacterial strains, namely Bacillus cereus, Micrococcus flavus, Citrobacter freundii, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas testosterone. Acetone and methanol were used for extraction; and the extracted yield was more when the solvent used was methanol. The antibacterial activity was done by both Agar disc diffusion method and Agar ditch method. The five bacterial strains showed varied response towards marine algal extracts. The most susceptible bacteria was B. cereus followed by K. pneumoniae and C. freundii while the most resistant bacteria were M. flavus and P. testosteroni. Among the 26 algae screened, E. intestinalis was the most potent alga and thus, this alga was selected for further studies. E. intestinalis was extracted in petroleum ether, 1,4-dioxan, acetone, methanol and DMF, and their antibacterial activity was studied against the above-stated five bacterial strains using agar disc method. Maximum extractive value of E. intestinalis was in methanol (2.05%) and minimum was in acetone (0.38%). The most susceptible bacteria was K. pneumoniae and maximum antibacterial activity was shown by petroleum ether extract and minimum was shown by 1,4-dioxan extract. The most resistant bacteria were M. flavus and C. freundii. The MIC values of E. intestinalis extracts ranged from 2500-9.765 microg/0.5 ml against B. cereus and K. pneumoniae. From these results it is concluded that the acetone extract of E. intestinalis is the most potent extract and can be used as a lead molecule in drug discovery in inhibiting some of the bacterial strains. E. intestinalis can be used as a promising novel marine antimicrobial agent in the coming years.

摘要

本研究旨在调查从古吉拉特邦不同沿海地区采集的海藻的抗菌潜力并进行筛选。对属于红藻门、绿藻门和褐藻门的26种海藻进行了筛选,以检测它们对5种临床重要细菌菌株的潜在抗菌活性,这5种菌株分别是蜡样芽孢杆菌、微黄微球菌、弗氏柠檬酸杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和睾丸酮假单胞菌。使用丙酮和甲醇进行提取;当使用甲醇作为溶剂时,提取产率更高。通过琼脂平板扩散法和琼脂沟法进行抗菌活性检测。这5种细菌菌株对海藻提取物表现出不同的反应。最敏感的细菌是蜡样芽孢杆菌,其次是肺炎克雷伯菌和弗氏柠檬酸杆菌,而最具抗性的细菌是微黄微球菌和睾丸酮假单胞菌。在筛选的26种海藻中,肠浒苔是最具效力的海藻,因此,选择该海藻进行进一步研究。用石油醚、1,4 - 二氧六环、丙酮、甲醇和二甲基甲酰胺对肠浒苔进行提取,并使用琼脂平板法研究其对上述5种细菌菌株的抗菌活性。肠浒苔的最大提取值在甲醇中(2.05%),最小在丙酮中(0.38%)。最敏感的细菌是肺炎克雷伯菌,石油醚提取物显示出最大抗菌活性,1,4 - 二氧六环提取物显示的抗菌活性最小。最具抗性的细菌是微黄微球菌和弗氏柠檬酸杆菌。肠浒苔提取物对蜡样芽孢杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的最低抑菌浓度值范围为2500 - 9.765微克/0.5毫升。从这些结果可以得出结论,肠浒苔的丙酮提取物是最具效力的提取物,可作为药物发现中抑制某些细菌菌株的先导分子。在未来几年,肠浒苔可作为一种有前景的新型海洋抗菌剂。

相似文献

1
Marine algae: screening for a potent antibacterial agent.海洋藻类:筛选强效抗菌剂。
J Herb Pharmacother. 2007;7(1):73-86.
2
Antibacterial and antifungal activities of extracts of combretum molle.风车子提取物的抗菌和抗真菌活性。
Ethiop Med J. 2006 Jul;44(3):269-77.
3
Antibacterial activity of some plant extracts used in folk medicine.一些民间医学中使用的植物提取物的抗菌活性。
J Herb Pharmacother. 2007;7(3-4):191-201. doi: 10.1080/15228940802152836.
4
Antibacterial activity of Achillea clavennae essential oil against respiratory tract pathogens.高山蓍草精油对呼吸道病原体的抗菌活性。
Fitoterapia. 2004 Dec;75(7-8):733-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2004.05.009.
5
Antibacterial activity of Acalypha indica L.印度铁苋菜的抗菌活性
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2008 Sep-Oct;12(5):299-302.
6
In vitro screening of five local medicinal plants for antibacterial activity using disc diffusion method.采用纸片扩散法对五种当地药用植物进行体外抗菌活性筛选。
Trop Biomed. 2005 Dec;22(2):165-70.
7
Antimicrobial effect of water extract of sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) on the growth of some food borne bacteria including pathogens.漆树(盐肤木)水提取物对包括病原菌在内的一些食源细菌生长的抗菌作用。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 Dec 1;97(1):63-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.04.009.
8
The in-vitro antimicrobial activity of Abrus precatorius (L) fabaceae extract on some clinical pathogens.相思子豆科提取物对某些临床病原体的体外抗菌活性。
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2008 Mar;15(1):32-7.
9
Screening of some Kenyan medicinal plants for antibacterial activity.对肯尼亚药用植物进行抗菌活性筛选。
Phytother Res. 2010 Jan;24(1):150-3. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2866.
10
Antibacterial activity of Thymus daenensis methanolic extract.百里香甲醇提取物的抗菌活性。
Pak J Pharm Sci. 2008 Jul;21(3):210-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Marine Macroalgae Display Bioreductant Efficacy for Fabricating Metallic Nanoparticles: Intra/Extracellular Mechanism and Potential Biomedical Applications.海洋大型藻类在制备金属纳米颗粒方面展现出生物还原剂功效:细胞内/外机制及潜在生物医学应用
Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2021 Nov 27;2021:5985377. doi: 10.1155/2021/5985377. eCollection 2021.
2
Effect of Green Algae Extract on Growth, Modulate Immunity, and Defenses against Infection in .绿藻提取物对……生长、调节免疫力及抗感染防御的影响
Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 4;10(11):2033. doi: 10.3390/ani10112033.
3
Antibacterial Derivatives of Marine Algae: An Overview of Pharmacological Mechanisms and Applications.
海洋藻类的抗菌衍生物:药理机制与应用概述
Mar Drugs. 2016 Apr 22;14(4):81. doi: 10.3390/md14040081.
4
Marine peptides and their anti-infective activities.海洋肽及其抗感染活性。
Mar Drugs. 2015 Jan 16;13(1):618-54. doi: 10.3390/md13010618.
5
Marine pharmacology in 2007-8: Marine compounds with antibacterial, anticoagulant, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antimalarial, antiprotozoal, antituberculosis, and antiviral activities; affecting the immune and nervous system, and other miscellaneous mechanisms of action.2007-2008 年海洋药物学:具有抗菌、抗凝血、抗真菌、抗炎、抗疟原虫、抗原生动物、抗结核和抗病毒活性的海洋化合物;影响免疫和神经系统以及其他各种作用机制。
Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Mar;153(2):191-222. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2010.08.008. Epub 2010 Sep 15.