Suppr超能文献

如果没坏,就不要进行价格管制:公平交易办公室与药品价格调控方案

If it ain't broke, don't price fix it: the OFT and the PPRS.

作者信息

Towse Adrian

机构信息

Office of Health Economics, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2007 Jul;16(7):653-65. doi: 10.1002/hec.1263.

Abstract

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) Report on the UK Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme (PPRS) recommends that when the current five-year PPRS expires in 2010 it be replaced with 'value-based pricing' which involves pre-launch centralised government price setting based on a cost-per-QALY threshold plus periodic ex post reviews. I examine the validity of the OFTs criticisms of the existing PPRS, review its proposals and propose an alternative way forward. I conclude that PPRS has performed well as a procurement bargain between industry and the UK government. It does not, however, incentivise efficient relative prices. That is not its job. I identify a number of problems with the OFT proposals. I recommend that key elements of a reformed UK pharmaceutical environment for 2010 should include an expanded role for HTA but with companies retaining freedom to set prices at launch; HTA use targeted via a contingent value of information approach; a retained backstop PPRS, perhaps moving to an RPI-X type control; the use of risk sharing and non-linear pricing arrangements; measures to ensure more effective therapeutic switching at local level; and measures to improve the take up of cost-effective treatments.

摘要

公平交易办公室(OFT)关于英国药品价格监管计划(PPRS)的报告建议,当现行的五年期PPRS于2010年到期时,应以“基于价值的定价”取而代之,这涉及到在药品上市前由政府集中设定价格,该价格基于每质量调整生命年(QALY)成本阈值,并定期进行事后审查。我审视了公平交易办公室对现行PPRS批评的合理性,回顾了其提议,并提出了另一条前进的道路。我得出结论,PPRS作为制药行业与英国政府之间的采购协议,运行良好。然而,它并未激励形成有效的相对价格。这并非它的职责所在。我指出了公平交易办公室提议中存在的若干问题。我建议,2010年英国药品环境改革的关键要素应包括扩大卫生技术评估(HTA)的作用,但同时公司在药品上市时仍保留定价自由;通过信息的或有价值方法来有针对性地使用HTA;保留PPRS作为兜底措施,或许转向零售物价指数减X(RPI-X)类型的管控;采用风险分担和非线性定价安排;采取措施确保在地方层面更有效地进行治疗转换;以及采取措施提高对具有成本效益的治疗方法的采用率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验