• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如果没坏,就不要进行价格管制:公平交易办公室与药品价格调控方案

If it ain't broke, don't price fix it: the OFT and the PPRS.

作者信息

Towse Adrian

机构信息

Office of Health Economics, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2007 Jul;16(7):653-65. doi: 10.1002/hec.1263.

DOI:10.1002/hec.1263
PMID:17595047
Abstract

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) Report on the UK Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme (PPRS) recommends that when the current five-year PPRS expires in 2010 it be replaced with 'value-based pricing' which involves pre-launch centralised government price setting based on a cost-per-QALY threshold plus periodic ex post reviews. I examine the validity of the OFTs criticisms of the existing PPRS, review its proposals and propose an alternative way forward. I conclude that PPRS has performed well as a procurement bargain between industry and the UK government. It does not, however, incentivise efficient relative prices. That is not its job. I identify a number of problems with the OFT proposals. I recommend that key elements of a reformed UK pharmaceutical environment for 2010 should include an expanded role for HTA but with companies retaining freedom to set prices at launch; HTA use targeted via a contingent value of information approach; a retained backstop PPRS, perhaps moving to an RPI-X type control; the use of risk sharing and non-linear pricing arrangements; measures to ensure more effective therapeutic switching at local level; and measures to improve the take up of cost-effective treatments.

摘要

公平交易办公室(OFT)关于英国药品价格监管计划(PPRS)的报告建议,当现行的五年期PPRS于2010年到期时,应以“基于价值的定价”取而代之,这涉及到在药品上市前由政府集中设定价格,该价格基于每质量调整生命年(QALY)成本阈值,并定期进行事后审查。我审视了公平交易办公室对现行PPRS批评的合理性,回顾了其提议,并提出了另一条前进的道路。我得出结论,PPRS作为制药行业与英国政府之间的采购协议,运行良好。然而,它并未激励形成有效的相对价格。这并非它的职责所在。我指出了公平交易办公室提议中存在的若干问题。我建议,2010年英国药品环境改革的关键要素应包括扩大卫生技术评估(HTA)的作用,但同时公司在药品上市时仍保留定价自由;通过信息的或有价值方法来有针对性地使用HTA;保留PPRS作为兜底措施,或许转向零售物价指数减X(RPI-X)类型的管控;采用风险分担和非线性定价安排;采取措施确保在地方层面更有效地进行治疗转换;以及采取措施提高对具有成本效益的治疗方法的采用率。

相似文献

1
If it ain't broke, don't price fix it: the OFT and the PPRS.如果没坏,就不要进行价格管制:公平交易办公室与药品价格调控方案
Health Econ. 2007 Jul;16(7):653-65. doi: 10.1002/hec.1263.
2
Drug price reform in the UK: debunking the myths.英国的药品价格改革:破除迷思
Health Econ. 2007 Oct;16(10):981-92. doi: 10.1002/hec.1300.
3
Straight talk with... Mark Sculpher. Interview by Kate Ravilious.坦诚对话……马克·斯库勒普访谈。采访者:凯特·雷维利乌斯。
Nat Med. 2012 Sep;18(9):1315. doi: 10.1038/nm0912-1315.
4
The UK pharmaceutical market. An overview.英国制药市场。概述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996;10 Suppl 2:14-25. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199600102-00005.
5
Variations in external reference pricing implementation: does it matter for public policy?外部参考定价实施的差异:这对公共政策有影响吗?
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Dec;20(9):1375-1397. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01100-y. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
6
[Risk sharing methods in middle income countries].[中等收入国家的风险分担方法]
Acta Pharm Hung. 2012;82(1):43-52.
7
Operationalizing value-based pricing of medicines : a taxonomy of approaches.使药品的基于价值的定价具有操作性:方法分类。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Jan;31(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s40273-012-0001-x.
8
Competition and the Reference Pricing Scheme for pharmaceuticals.药品竞争与参考定价机制。
J Health Econ. 2011 Dec;30(6):1137-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
9
A pharmacoeconomic modeling approach to estimate a value-based price for new oncology drugs in Europe.一种用于估算欧洲新型肿瘤药物基于价值的价格的药物经济学建模方法。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2012 Mar;18(1):57-67. doi: 10.1177/1078155210390724. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
10
Parallel imports and the pricing of pharmaceutical products: evidence from the European Union.药品的平行进口与定价:来自欧盟的证据
J Health Econ. 2004 Sep;23(5):1035-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.03.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Debates over orphan drug pricing: a meta-narrative literature review.关于罕见病药物定价的争论:一项元叙事文献综述
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Mar 7;20(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03634-2.
2
Risk-Sharing Agreements in the EU: A Systematic Review of Major Trends.欧盟的风险分担协议:主要趋势的系统综述
Pharmacoecon Open. 2018 Jun;2(2):109-123. doi: 10.1007/s41669-017-0044-1.
3
Value-Based Assessment of New Medical Technologies: Towards a Robust Methodological Framework for the Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in the Context of Health Technology Assessment.
基于价值的新医疗技术评估:构建用于在卫生技术评估背景下应用多标准决策分析的稳健方法框架。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 May;34(5):435-46. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0370-z.
4
Operationalizing value-based pricing of medicines : a taxonomy of approaches.使药品的基于价值的定价具有操作性:方法分类。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Jan;31(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s40273-012-0001-x.
5
Value based pricing, research and development, and patient access schemes. Will the United Kingdom get it right or wrong?基于价值的定价、研究与开发以及患者准入方案。英国会做对还是做错?
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Sep;70(3):360-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03740.x.
6
Should financial incentives be used to differentially reward 'me-too' and innovative drugs?是否应该使用经济激励措施来差异化奖励“me-too”药物和创新药物?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(1):1-17. doi: 10.2165/11318770-000000000-00000.