Suppr超能文献

定期减轻坐骨支撑负荷以降低压疮风险。

Periodically relieving ischial sitting load to decrease the risk of pressure ulcers.

作者信息

Makhsous Mohsen, Rowles Diane M, Rymer William Z, Bankard James, Nam Ellis K, Chen David, Lin Fang

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jul;88(7):862-70. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.03.017.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relieving effect on interface pressure of an alternate sitting protocol involving a sitting posture that reduces ischial support.

DESIGN

Repeated measures in 2 protocols on 3 groups of subjects.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty able-bodied persons, 20 persons with paraplegia, and 20 persons with tetraplegia.

INTERVENTIONS

Two 1-hour protocols were used: alternate and normal plus pushup. In the alternate protocol, sitting posture was alternated every 10 minutes between normal (sitting upright with ischial support) and with partially removed ischial support (WO-BPS) postures; in the normal plus pushup protocol, sitting was in normal posture with pushups (lifting the subject off the seat) performed every 20 minutes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Interface pressure on seat and backrest.

RESULTS

In WO-BPS posture, the concentrated interface pressure observed around the ischia in normal posture was significantly repositioned to the thighs. By cyclically repositioning the interface pressure, the alternate protocol was superior to the normal plus pushup protocol in terms of a significantly lower average interface pressure over the buttocks.

CONCLUSIONS

A sitting protocol periodically reducing the ischial support helps lower the sitting load on the buttocks, especially the area close to ischial tuberosities.

摘要

目的

研究一种交替坐姿方案对界面压力的缓解作用,该方案涉及一种减少坐骨支撑的坐姿。

设计

对三组受试者在两种方案中进行重复测量。

设置

实验室。

参与者

20名身体健全者、20名截瘫患者和20名四肢瘫患者。

干预措施

采用两种1小时的方案:交替方案和正常加俯卧撑方案。在交替方案中,坐姿每10分钟在正常坐姿(坐骨支撑时坐直)和部分去除坐骨支撑(WO-BPS)的姿势之间交替;在正常加俯卧撑方案中,以正常姿势就坐,每20分钟进行一次俯卧撑(将受试者抬离座位)。

主要观察指标

座椅和靠背上的界面压力。

结果

在WO-BPS姿势下,正常姿势时在坐骨周围观察到的集中界面压力显著重新分布到大腿。通过周期性地重新分布界面压力,交替方案在臀部平均界面压力显著更低方面优于正常加俯卧撑方案。

结论

一种定期减少坐骨支撑的坐姿方案有助于降低臀部的坐姿负荷,尤其是靠近坐骨结节的区域。

相似文献

3
Sitting with adjustable ischial and back supports: biomechanical changes.带有可调节坐骨和背部支撑的座椅:生物力学变化
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 1;28(11):1113-21; discussion 1121-2. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000068243.63203.A8.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of antidecubitus mattresses.防褥疮床垫的评估
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2005 Sep;43(5):541-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02351025.
2
Etiology of decubitus ulcers.褥疮的病因
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1961 Jan;42:19-29.
3
Sitting with adjustable ischial and back supports: biomechanical changes.带有可调节坐骨和背部支撑的座椅:生物力学变化
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 1;28(11):1113-21; discussion 1121-2. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000068243.63203.A8.
6
Factors affecting static seat cushion comfort.影响静态座垫舒适度的因素。
Ergonomics. 2001 Aug 15;44(10):901-21. doi: 10.1080/00140130110064685.
7
Establishing predictive indicators for the status of loaded soft tissues.建立加载软组织状态的预测指标。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 Jun;90(6):2231-7. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.6.2231.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验