Makhsous Mohsen, Priebe Michael, Bankard James, Rowles Diana, Zeigler Mary, Chen David, Lin Fang
Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, 645 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 100, Chicago, IL 60640, USA.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2007;30(5):497-507. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2007.11754584.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To study the effect on tissue perfusion of relieving interface pressure using standard wheelchair pushups compared with a mechanical automated dynamic pressure relief system.
Repeated measures in 2 protocols on 3 groups of subjects.
Twenty individuals with motor-complete paraplegia below T4, 20 with motor-complete tetraplegia, and 20 able-bodied subjects.
Two 1-hour sitting protocols: dynamic protocol, sitting configuration alternated every 10 minutes between a normal sitting configuration and an off-loading configuration; wheelchair pushup protocol, normal sitting configuration with standard wheelchair pushup once every 20 minutes.
Transcutaneous partial pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide measured from buttock overlying the ischial tuberosity and interface pressure measured at the seat back and buttocks. Perfusion deterioration and recovery times were calculated during changes in interface pressures.
In the off-loading configuration, concentrated interface pressure during the normal sitting configuration was significantly diminished, and tissue perfusion was significantly improved. Wheelchair pushups showed complete relief of interface pressure but incomplete recovery of tissue perfusion.
Interface pressure analysis does not provide complete information about the effectiveness of pressure relief maneuvers. Measures of tissue perfusion may help establish more effective strategies. Relief achieved by standard wheelchair pushups may not be sufficient to recover tissue perfusion compromised during sitting; alternate maneuvers may be necessary. The dynamic seating system provided effective pressure relief with sustained reduction in interface pressure adequate for complete recovery of tissue perfusion. Differences in perfusion recovery times between subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI) and controls raise questions about the importance of changes in vascular responses to pressure after SCI.
背景/目的:比较使用标准轮椅俯卧撑与机械自动动态减压系统缓解界面压力对组织灌注的影响。
对三组受试者进行两种方案的重复测量。
20名胸4以下运动完全性截瘫患者、20名运动完全性四肢瘫患者和20名健全受试者。
两个1小时的坐姿方案:动态方案,正常坐姿和卸载坐姿每10分钟交替一次;轮椅俯卧撑方案,正常坐姿下每20分钟进行一次标准轮椅俯卧撑。
测量坐骨结节上方臀部的经皮氧分压和二氧化碳分压,以及座椅靠背和臀部的界面压力。在界面压力变化期间计算灌注恶化和恢复时间。
在卸载坐姿时,正常坐姿期间集中的界面压力显著降低,组织灌注显著改善。轮椅俯卧撑可使界面压力完全缓解,但组织灌注未完全恢复。
界面压力分析不能提供关于减压动作有效性的完整信息。组织灌注测量可能有助于制定更有效的策略。标准轮椅俯卧撑所实现的减压可能不足以恢复坐姿期间受损的组织灌注;可能需要其他动作。动态座椅系统提供了有效的减压,界面压力持续降低,足以使组织灌注完全恢复。脊髓损伤(SCI)患者与对照组在灌注恢复时间上的差异,引发了关于SCI后血管对压力反应变化重要性的疑问。