Miyashita Mitsunori, Morita Tatsuya, Shima Yasuo, Kimura Rieko, Takahashi Mikako, Adachi Isamu
Department of Adult Nursing/Palliative Care Nursing, School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2007;24(6):463-9. doi: 10.1177/1049909107302301. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
We evaluated nurse views on the adequacy of decision-making discussion among nurses and physicians regarding artificial hydration for terminally ill cancer patients and nurse distress arising from artificial hydration issues, as well as factors related to this distress. A self-administered questionnaire consisting of 4 questions about nurse views of discussions regarding artificial hydration and 6 questions about nurse distress arising from artificial hydration issues was distributed in participating institutions in October 2002 and returned by mail. A total of 3328 responses (79%) were analyzed. Almost half of the nurses felt that discussion of terminal hydration issues was insufficient. Among responses, 39% of oncology nurses and 78% of palliative care unit (PCU) nurses agreed that patients and medical practitioners discuss the issue of artificial hydration adequately, and 49% and 79%, respectively, agreed that medical practitioners discuss the issue of artificial hydration with other physicians adequately. As for distress on behalf of patients and families who refuse artificial hydration, 44% of oncology nurses and 57% of PCU nurses experienced such distress for patients, and 19% and 28% did so for families, respectively. Furthermore, 48% of oncology nurses and 47% of PCU nurses experienced distress arising from disagreements among medical practitioners about withholding artificial hydration, whereas 44% and 43% experienced distress about medical practitioners refusing artificial hydration, respectively. Discussion among care providers regarding artificial hydration is insufficient, particularly in general wards. Medical practitioners caring for terminally ill cancer patients should engage in greater discussion among patient-centered teams and facilitate individualized decision making.
我们评估了护士对于护士与医生之间就晚期癌症患者人工补液问题进行决策讨论的充分性的看法,以及因人工补液问题而产生的护士困扰,还有与这种困扰相关的因素。2002年10月,在参与研究的机构中发放了一份自填式问卷,其中包括4个关于护士对人工补液讨论看法的问题以及6个关于因人工补液问题而产生的护士困扰的问题,并通过邮寄方式回收。共分析了3328份回复(79%)。几乎一半的护士认为关于终末期补液问题的讨论不充分。在回复中,39%的肿瘤护士和78%的姑息治疗病房(PCU)护士认为患者与医生就人工补液问题进行了充分讨论,分别有49%和79%的护士认为医生与其他医生就人工补液问题进行了充分讨论。至于代表拒绝人工补液的患者和家属所产生的困扰,44%的肿瘤护士和57%的PCU护士为患者感到这种困扰,分别有19%和28%的护士为家属感到这种困扰。此外,48%的肿瘤护士和47%的PCU护士因医生在停止人工补液问题上存在分歧而感到困扰,而分别有44%和43%的护士因医生拒绝人工补液而感到困扰。医护人员之间关于人工补液的讨论不充分,尤其是在普通病房。照顾晚期癌症患者的医生应该在以患者为中心的团队中进行更多讨论,并促进个性化决策。