Suppr超能文献

为参加成瘾治疗的无家可归退伍军人提供强化成瘾/住房个案管理:一项随机对照试验。

Providing intensive addiction/housing case management to homeless veterans enrolled in addictions treatment: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Malte Carol A, Cox Koriann, Saxon Andrew J

机构信息

Center of Excellence in Substance Abuse Treatment and Education (CESATE), Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 May;31(3):231-241. doi: 10.1037/adb0000273.

Abstract

This study sought to determine whether homeless veterans entering Veterans Affairs (VA) substance use treatment randomized to intensive addiction/housing case management (AHCM) had improved housing, substance use, mental health, and functional outcomes and lower acute health care utilization, compared to a housing support group (HSG) control. Homeless veterans (n = 181) entering outpatient VA substance use treatment were randomized to AHCM and HSG and received treatment for 12 months. AHCM provided individualized housing, substance use and mental health case management, life skills training, and community outreach. The control condition was a weekly drop-in housing support group. Adjusted longitudinal analyses compared groups on baseline to month 12 change in percentage of days housed and functional status, substance use, and mental health outcomes (36-Item Short-Form Health Survey; Addiction Severity Index [ASI]). Negative binomial regression models compared groups on health care utilization. Both conditions significantly increased percentage of days housed, with no differences detected between conditions. In total, 74 (81.3%) AHCM and 64 (71.1%) HSG participants entered long-term housing (odds ratio = 1.9, 95% confidence interval [0.9, 4.0], p = .088). HSG participants experienced a greater decrease in emergency department visits than AHCM (p = .037), whereas AHCM participants remained in substance use treatment 52.7 days longer (p = .005) and had greater study treatment participation (p < .001) than HSG. ASI alcohol composite scores improved more for HSG than AHCM (p = .006), and both conditions improved on ASI drug and psychiatric scores and alcohol/drug abstinence. AHCM did not demonstrate overarching benefits beyond standard VA housing and substance use care. For those veterans not entering or losing long-term housing, different approaches to outreach and ongoing intervention are required. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

本研究旨在确定,与住房支持组(HSG)对照相比,进入退伍军人事务部(VA)物质使用治疗项目并被随机分配至强化成瘾/住房病例管理(AHCM)的无家可归退伍军人在住房、物质使用、心理健康和功能结局方面是否有所改善,以及急性医疗保健利用率是否更低。181名进入VA门诊物质使用治疗项目的无家可归退伍军人被随机分配至AHCM组和HSG组,并接受为期12个月的治疗。AHCM提供个性化的住房、物质使用和心理健康病例管理、生活技能培训以及社区外展服务。对照条件是每周一次的即来即享住房支持组。调整后的纵向分析比较了两组在基线至第12个月期间住房天数百分比、功能状态、物质使用和心理健康结局(36项简短健康调查;成瘾严重程度指数[ASI])的变化。负二项回归模型比较了两组在医疗保健利用率方面的情况。两种条件下住房天数百分比均显著增加,两组之间未发现差异。总体而言,74名(81.3%)AHCM组参与者和64名(71.1%)HSG组参与者进入了长期住房(优势比=1.9,95%置信区间[0.9, 4.0],p = 0.088)。HSG组参与者的急诊就诊次数减少幅度大于AHCM组(p = 0.037),而AHCM组参与者的物质使用治疗时间比HSG组长52.7天(p = 0.005),且研究治疗参与度更高(p < 0.001)。HSG组的ASI酒精综合评分改善幅度大于AHCM组(p = 0.006),两种条件下的ASI药物和精神科评分以及酒精/药物戒断情况均有所改善。AHCM并未显示出超出标准VA住房和物质使用护理之外的总体益处。对于那些未进入或失去长期住房的退伍军人,需要采取不同的外展和持续干预方法。(PsycINFO数据库记录

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验