Teich Judith L, Ireys Henry T
Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 1 Choke Cherry Rd., Room 6-1065, Rockville, MD 20857, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Jul;58(7):991-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.7.991.
Little national information is available to help policy makers understand the methods that states use to regulate residential facilities for children with mental illness. This article describes the results of a government-sponsored survey of state officials that examined how states license, regulate, and monitor such facilities.
Questionnaires were mailed to selected officials in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, followed by extensive telephone and e-mail contacts. Questionnaire items covered program characteristics, licensing and accreditation, mandated services, monitoring and oversight methods, and payment sources.
Information was gathered on 71 types of residential facilities in 38 states, accounting for 3,628 separate residential facilities with 50,507 beds as of September 30, 2003. States differed widely in the types of residential facilities that they regulate and their mix of regulatory methods, which included requirements for announced and unannounced visits, mandated staff-to-client ratios, minimum levels of education for facility directors, specifications for licensing practices and critical incident reporting, mandated complaint review procedures, and accreditation from designated organizations. Welfare, mental health, and health departments all participated in regulating facilities.
States relied on at least several regulatory methods, but no state used all of the possible methods. The regulatory environment is complex in most states because several agencies are involved in licensing, regulating, and reviewing complaints. To ensure that residential facilities effectively address the needs of children with mental illness and their families, policy makers should review and improve their state's data on methods for regulating residential facilities.
几乎没有全国性信息可帮助政策制定者了解各州用于监管精神病患儿住宿设施的方法。本文描述了一项由政府发起的针对州官员的调查结果,该调查考察了各州如何对这类设施进行许可、监管和监督。
向50个州及哥伦比亚特区的选定官员邮寄问卷,随后进行广泛的电话和电子邮件联系。问卷项目涵盖项目特征、许可和认证、法定服务、监督和审查方法以及资金来源。
收集了38个州71种住宿设施的信息,截至2003年9月30日,这些设施共有3628个独立的住宿场所,50507张床位。各州在其所监管的住宿设施类型及其监管方法组合上差异很大,监管方法包括要求进行公告和不公告检查、规定员工与客户的比例、设施主管的最低教育水平、许可实践和重大事件报告的规范、法定投诉审查程序以及指定组织的认证。福利、心理健康和卫生部门都参与了设施监管。
各州至少依赖几种监管方法,但没有一个州使用了所有可能的方法。大多数州的监管环境很复杂,因为有几个机构参与许可、监管和投诉审查。为确保住宿设施有效满足精神病患儿及其家庭的需求,政策制定者应审查并改进本州关于住宿设施监管方法的数据。