Bolger Ciaran, Kelleher Michael O, McEvoy Linda, Brayda-Bruno M, Kaelin A, Lazennec J-Y, Le Huec J-C, Logroscino C, Mata P, Moreta P, Saillant G, Zeller R
Neurosurgical Research and Development Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Eur Spine J. 2007 Nov;16(11):1919-24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0409-8. Epub 2007 Jun 30.
Pedicle screw fixation has achieved significant popularity amongst spinal surgeons for both single and multi-level spinal fusion. Misplacement and pedicle cortical violation occurs in over 20% of screw placement and can result in potential complications such as dysthesia, paraparesis or paraplegia. There have been many advances in techniques available for navigating through the pedicle; however, these techniques are not without drawbacks. A new electrical conductivity-measuring device, previously evaluated on the porcine model to detect the pedicle violation, was evaluated amongst nine European Hospitals to be used in conjunction with the methods currently used in that centre. This new device is based on two original principles; the device is integrated in the drilling or screwing tool. The technology allows real-time detection of perforation through two independent parameters, impedance variation and evoked muscle contractions. Data was collected twofold. Initially, the surgeon was given the device and a comparison was made between the devices ability to detect a breech and the surgeon's ability to detect one using his traditional methods of pedicle preparation. In the second module of the study, the surgeon was limited to using the electrical conductivity detection device as their sole guide to detect pedicle breaches. A comparison was made between the detection ability of the device and the other detection possibilities. Post-operative fine cut CT scanning was used to detect the pedicle breaches. Overall, the 11 trial surgeons performed a total of 521 pedicle drillings on 97 patients. Initially there were 147 drillings with 23 breaches detected. The detection rate of these breaches were 22/23 for the device compared to 10/23 by the surgeon. Over both parts of the study 64 breaches (12.3%) were confirmed on post-operative CT imaging. The electrical conductivity detection device detected 63 of the 64 breaches (98.4%). There was one false negative and four false positives. This gives the device an overall sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 99% for detecting a pedicle breach. The negative predictive value was 99.8%, with a positive predictive value of 94%. No adverse event was noted with the use of the electrical conductivity device. Electrical conductivity monitoring may provide a simple, safe and sensitive method of detecting pedicle breech during routine perforation of the pedicle, in the course of pedicle screw placement.
椎弓根螺钉固定术在脊柱外科医生中已广泛应用于单节段和多节段脊柱融合手术。超过20%的螺钉置入会出现位置不当和椎弓根皮质破损,这可能导致感觉异常、轻瘫或截瘫等潜在并发症。在椎弓根导航技术方面已有诸多进展;然而,这些技术并非没有缺点。一种先前在猪模型上评估用于检测椎弓根破损的新型电导率测量装置,在九家欧洲医院进行了评估,以与该中心目前使用的方法结合使用。这种新装置基于两个原创原理;该装置集成在钻孔或拧螺丝工具中。这项技术可通过两个独立参数实时检测穿孔情况,即阻抗变化和诱发肌肉收缩。数据收集分两方面进行。首先,给外科医生提供该装置,比较该装置检测穿孔的能力与外科医生使用其传统椎弓根准备方法检测穿孔的能力。在研究的第二个模块中,外科医生仅限于使用电导率检测装置作为检测椎弓根穿孔的唯一指导。比较了该装置的检测能力与其他检测可能性。术后薄层CT扫描用于检测椎弓根穿孔。总体而言,11名参与试验的外科医生对97名患者共进行了521次椎弓根钻孔。最初有147次钻孔,检测到23处穿孔。该装置对这些穿孔的检测率为22/23,而外科医生的检测率为10/23。在研究的两个部分中,术后CT成像证实有64处穿孔(12.3%)。电导率检测装置检测到了64处穿孔中的63处(98.4%)。有1例假阴性和4例假阳性。这使得该装置检测椎弓根穿孔的总体灵敏度为98%,特异性为99%。阴性预测值为99.8%,阳性预测值为94%。使用电导率装置未观察到不良事件。在椎弓根螺钉置入过程中,电导率监测可能为在常规椎弓根穿孔期间检测椎弓根穿孔提供一种简单、安全且灵敏的方法。