Eldridge Kathleen A, Sevier Mia, Jones Janice, Atkins David C, Christensen Andrew
Graduate School of Education and Psychology, Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA 90263-4608, USA.
J Fam Psychol. 2007 Jun;21(2):218-26. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.218.
This study investigated demand-withdraw communication among 68 severely distressed couples seeking therapy, 66 moderately distressed couples seeking therapy, and 48 nondistressed couples. Self-report and videotaped discussions replicated previous research, demonstrating that greater demand-withdraw during relationship problem discussions was associated with greater distress and that overall, wife-demand/husband-withdraw was greater than husband-demand/wife-withdraw. Results extended the conflict structure view of demand-withdraw by indicating that this gender polarity in demand-withdraw roles varied in strength and direction depending on who chose the topic for discussion, distress level, and marriage length. Further, in videotaped personal problem discussions, typical gender patterns of demand-withdraw were reversed. Across the relationship and personal problem discussions, a pattern of gender polarity emerged when husbands held the burden of changing.
本研究调查了68对寻求治疗的极度困扰夫妻、66对寻求治疗的中度困扰夫妻和48对无困扰夫妻之间的要求-退缩沟通情况。自我报告和录像讨论重复了先前的研究,表明在关系问题讨论中更多的要求-退缩与更高的困扰相关,而且总体而言,妻子要求/丈夫退缩的情况比丈夫要求/妻子退缩的情况更多。结果扩展了要求-退缩的冲突结构观点,表明要求-退缩角色中的这种性别两极分化在强度和方向上因谁选择讨论话题、困扰程度和婚姻长度而异。此外,在录像的个人问题讨论中,典型的要求-退缩性别模式发生了逆转。在关系问题和个人问题讨论中,当丈夫承担改变的责任时,出现了一种性别两极分化模式。