Empathic Accuracy and Observed Demand Behavior in Couples.
作者信息
Hinnekens Céline, Vanhee Gaëlle, De Schryver Maarten, Ickes William, Verhofstadt Lesley L
机构信息
Family Lab, Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University Ghent, Belgium.
Learning and Implicit Processes Lab, Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University Ghent, Belgium.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 12;7:1370. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01370. eCollection 2016.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Empathic Accuracy and Observed Demand Behavior in Couples.夫妻间的共情准确性与观察到的需求行为
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 12;7:1370. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01370. eCollection 2016.
2
Demand behavior and empathic accuracy in observed conflict interactions in couples.夫妻间观察到的冲突互动中的需求行为与共情准确性。
J Soc Psychol. 2016 Jul-Aug;156(4):437-43. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2015.1115386. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
3
Observed and Perceived Disclosure and Empathy Are Associated With Better Relationship Adjustment and Quality of Life in Couples Coping With Vulvodynia.在应对外阴痛的夫妻中，观察到的和感知到的披露与同理心与更好的关系调适及生活质量相关。
Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Nov;45(8):1945-1956. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0739-x. Epub 2016 May 10.
4
Depression and empathic accuracy in couples: an interpersonal model of gender differences in depression.夫妻中的抑郁和共情准确性：抑郁的性别差异的人际模型。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Aug;22(8):1033-41. doi: 10.1177/0956797611414728. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
5
The effect of stress on empathic accuracy in romantic couples.压力对浪漫伴侣共情准确性的影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2019 Apr;33(3):327-337. doi: 10.1037/fam0000508. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
6
Is Empathic Accuracy Enough to Facilitate Responsive Behavior in Dyadic Interaction? Distinguishing Ability From Motivation.同理心准确性足以促进对偶互动中的响应行为吗？区分能力和动机。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Mar;27(3):394-404. doi: 10.1177/0956797615624491. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
7
Empathic Accuracy and Aggression in Couples: Individual and Dyadic Links.夫妻中的共情准确性与攻击性：个体及二元关系联系
J Marriage Fam. 2015 Jun;77(3):697-711. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12184.
8
Everyday empathic accuracy in younger and older couples: do you need to see your partner to know his or her feelings?年轻夫妻和老年夫妻日常共情准确性：是否需要看到伴侣才能了解其感受？
Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov 1;24(11):2210-7. doi: 10.1177/0956797613490747. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
9
Depression, relationship quality, and couples' demand/withdraw and demand/submit sequential interactions.抑郁、关系质量与夫妻间的需求/回避和需求/屈从的序列互动。
J Couns Psychol. 2014 Apr;61(2):264-79. doi: 10.1037/a0035241.
10
Couples' Perceptions of Each Other's Daily Affect: Empathic Accuracy, Assumed Similarity, and Indirect Accuracy.夫妻双方对彼此日常情绪的感知：共情准确性、假设相似性和间接准确性。
Fam Process. 2019 Mar;58(1):179-196. doi: 10.1111/famp.12344. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
引用本文的文献
1
Motivation and empathic accuracy during conflict interactions in couples: it's complicated!夫妻冲突互动中的动机与共情准确性：情况很复杂！
Motiv Emot. 2023;47(2):208-228. doi: 10.1007/s11031-022-09982-x. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
2
The Affiliative Role of Empathy in Everyday Interpersonal Interactions.同理心在日常人际互动中的亲和作用。
Eur J Pers. 2021 Mar;35(2):197-211. doi: 10.1002/per.2286. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
3
It is not always positive: emotional bias in young and older adults.并非总是积极的：年轻人和老年人的情绪偏见。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):2045-2057. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01614-2. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
本文引用的文献
1
The Role of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in Spouses' Support Interactions: An Observational Study.认知共情和情感共情在配偶支持互动中的作用：一项观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0149944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149944. eCollection 2016.
2
Demand behavior and empathic accuracy in observed conflict interactions in couples.夫妻间观察到的冲突互动中的需求行为与共情准确性。
J Soc Psychol. 2016 Jul-Aug;156(4):437-43. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2015.1115386. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
3
Gender, topic, and time in observed demand-withdraw interaction in cross- and same-sex couples.观察到的异性恋和同性恋伴侣中需求-回避互动中的性别、话题和时间。
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Jun;24(3):233-42. doi: 10.1037/a0019717.
4
Demand-withdraw communication in severely distressed, moderately distressed, and nondistressed couples: rigidity and polarity during relationship and personal problem discussions.重度困扰、中度困扰和无困扰夫妻中的要求-退缩沟通：关系及个人问题讨论中的僵化与两极化
J Fam Psychol. 2007 Jun;21(2):218-26. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.218.
5
The Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)-short form: reliability, validity, and factor structure.亲密关系体验量表（ECR）简版：信度、效度与因子结构
J Pers Assess. 2007 Apr;88(2):187-204. doi: 10.1080/00223890701268041.
6
When accuracy hurts, and when it helps: a test of the empathic accuracy model in marital interactions.何时准确性有害，何时有益：婚姻互动中移情准确性模型的一项检验。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Nov;85(5):881-93. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.881.
7
Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: a replication and extension.婚姻互动中的性别与冲突结构：一项重复与扩展研究
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Feb;61(1):16-27. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.61.1.16.
8
Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict.婚姻冲突中需求/退缩模式下的性别与社会结构
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Jul;59(1):73-81. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.59.1.73.
Zotero 插件