Elvinger François, Akey Bruce L, Senne Dennis A, Pierson F William, Porter-Spalding Barbara A, Spackman Erica, Suarez David L
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2007 Jul;19(4):341-8. doi: 10.1177/104063870701900401.
An outbreak of low-pathogenicity avian influenza (LPAI) H7N2 occurred in 2002 in the Shenandoah Valley, a high-density poultry production region in Virginia. Infected flocks were identified through a combination of observation of clinical signs and laboratory diagnostic tests designed to detect avian influenza (AI) antibodies, virus, or H7-specific RNA. In this report, fitness for purpose of 3 virus/RNA detection assays used during the outbreak was examined: 1) antigen capture enzyme immunoassay (AC-EIA), 2) real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RRT-PCR), and 3) virus isolation (VI). Results from testing 762 turkey and 2,216 chicken tracheal swab pooled specimens were analyzed to determine diagnostic sensitivities and specificities of these tests under field conditions using Bayesian techniques for validation of diagnostic tests in the absence of a "gold standard." Diagnostic sensitivities (with 95% probability intervals) in turkeys of AC-EIA and RRT-PCR, in reference to VI, were 65.9 (50.6; 81.3)% and 85.1 (71.9; 95.7)% and of VI 92.9 (78.0; 98.8)% in reference to AC-EIA or 88.7 (76.0; 97.2)% in reference to RRT-PCR; in chickens, diagnostic sensitivities were 75.1 (45.6; 94.2)%, 86.3 (65.9; 97.1)%, and 86.2 (65.8; 97.1)% or 86.3 (66.4; 97.2)%, respectively. Specificities were 99.1 (97.9; 99.8)%, 98.9 (98.0; 99.5)%, and 98.6 (97.4; 99.4)% or 98.8 (97.8; 99.5)% in turkeys and between 99.25% and 99.27% with probability intervals of approximately +/-0.4% for all tests in chickens. Simultaneous use of AC-EIA and RRT-PCR contributed significantly to the rapid control of the outbreak, but the AI RRT-PCR assay with >85% sensitivity and approximately 99% specificity, combined with relatively low cost and fast turnaround, could be used as the sole diagnostic test in outbreaks of LPAI.
2002年,弗吉尼亚州一个高密度家禽养殖区谢南多厄河谷爆发了低致病性禽流感(LPAI)H7N2。通过观察临床症状与旨在检测禽流感(AI)抗体、病毒或H7特异性RNA的实验室诊断测试相结合来识别受感染的鸡群。在本报告中,对疫情期间使用的3种病毒/RNA检测方法的适用性进行了研究:1)抗原捕获酶免疫测定(AC-EIA),2)实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RRT-PCR),以及3)病毒分离(VI)。对762份火鸡和2216份鸡气管拭子混合样本的检测结果进行分析,以使用贝叶斯技术在缺乏“金标准”的情况下验证诊断测试,从而确定这些测试在现场条件下的诊断敏感性和特异性。以VI为参照,AC-EIA和RRT-PCR在火鸡中的诊断敏感性(95%概率区间)分别为65.9(50.6;81.3)%和85.1(71.9;95.7)%,而VI以AC-EIA为参照的诊断敏感性为92.9(78.0;98.8)%,以RRT-PCR为参照的诊断敏感性为88.7(76.0;97.2)%;在鸡中,诊断敏感性分别为75.1(45.6;94.2)%、86.3(65.9;97.1)%和与VI相关的86.2(65.8;97.1)%或86.3(66.4;97.2)%。在火鸡中,特异性分别为99.1(97.9;99.8)%、98.9(98.0;99.5)%和98.6(97.4;99.4)%或98.8(97.8;99.5)%,在鸡中,所有测试的特异性在99.25%至99.27%之间,概率区间约为±0.4%。同时使用AC-EIA和RRT-PCR对疫情的快速控制有显著贡献,但灵敏度>85%且特异性约为99%、成本相对较低且周转迅速的禽流感RRT-PCR检测方法可作为LPAI疫情中的唯一诊断测试。