Borden K L, Beckmann P, Lane A N
National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, England.
Eur J Biochem. 1991 Dec 5;202(2):459-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16395.x.
The antirepressor indole 3-propanoate has been shown by X-ray crystallography to bind in a different orientation compared with the natural corepressor for the tryp repressor, L-tryptophan (Lawson, C.L. & Sigler, P. B. (1988) Nature 333, 869-871). This suggests a simple difference between what constitutes a corepressor versus an antirepressor. We have used visible absorption and 1H-NMR spectroscopy to characterise the nature of several ligand-repressor complexes and DNA-binding assays to assess the relative operator binding affinities. 5-Fluorotryptophan binds with similar affinity and in the same orientation as L-tryptophan, and is an equally effective corepressor. In contrast, the tight-binding antirepressor indole 3-acrylate binds in the same orientation as indole 3-propanoate. Indole, also an antirepressor, also binds in the indole-3-propanoate orientation. 5-Methyltryptamine, a corepressor, shows spectroscopic characteristics of both tryptophan and indoleacrylate, though NOEs indicate that the tryptophan orientation is preferred. These results indicate that the ammonium group in the side chain is essential both for activation and binding in the L-tryptophan orientation. Antirepressors, lacking the ammonium group, bind in the more favourable indole-3-propanoate orientation. Differences in the NMR signatures of the different repressor-ligand complexes indicate that the details of the conformations depend on the nature of the ligands and their orientation within the binding site. Despite any conformational rearrangement of the protein on binding, dissociation of ligands is facile: 5-fluorotryptophan dissociates rapidly at 313 K. These findings complement and extend the X-ray and thermodynamic analyses of ligand binding.
通过X射线晶体学研究表明,抗阻遏物吲哚3 - 丙酸酯与色氨酸阻遏蛋白的天然辅阻遏物L - 色氨酸相比,其结合方向不同(劳森,C.L. & 西格勒,P.B.(1988年)《自然》333卷,869 - 871页)。这表明了构成辅阻遏物与抗阻遏物的简单差异。我们利用可见吸收光谱和1H - NMR光谱来表征几种配体 - 阻遏蛋白复合物的性质,并通过DNA结合实验来评估相对的操纵基因结合亲和力。5 - 氟色氨酸与L - 色氨酸以相似的亲和力并以相同的方向结合,并且是同样有效的辅阻遏物。相比之下,紧密结合的抗阻遏物吲哚3 - 丙烯酸酯与吲哚3 - 丙酸酯以相同的方向结合。吲哚也是一种抗阻遏物,同样以吲哚3 - 丙酸酯的方向结合。5 - 甲基色胺是一种辅阻遏物,显示出色氨酸和吲哚丙烯酸酯的光谱特征,尽管核Overhauser效应(NOEs)表明色氨酸的方向更受青睐。这些结果表明,侧链中的铵基团对于以L - 色氨酸方向的激活和结合都是必不可少的。缺乏铵基团的抗阻遏物以更有利的吲哚3 - 丙酸酯方向结合。不同阻遏蛋白 - 配体复合物的NMR信号差异表明,构象的细节取决于配体的性质及其在结合位点内的方向。尽管在结合时蛋白质会发生任何构象重排,但配体的解离很容易:5 - 氟色氨酸在313 K时迅速解离。这些发现补充并扩展了配体结合的X射线和热力学分析。