Tak Nannah I, Te Velde Saskia J, Brug Johannes
EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boerchorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Public Health Nutr. 2007 Dec;10(12):1497-507. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007000456. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
To evaluate the effect of a primary school-based intervention providing free fruit and vegetables (F&V), separately for children of Dutch and of non-Western ethnicity.
Primary schools in two regions (west and east) in The Netherlands.
Participating schoolchildren and their parents completed questionnaires at baseline and 1 year later, including questions on usual F&V intake, potential determinants and general demographics. Primary outcomes were the usual fruit intake and the usual vegetable intake as assessed by parent- and child self-reported food frequency measures. Secondary outcome measures were child- or parent-reported taste preference, knowledge of daily recommendations, availability, and accessibility for fruit intake. Multilevel regression analyses were used to assess differences at follow-up adjusted for baseline values between the control and intervention group using both child and parent reports.
Five hundred and sixty-five children of Dutch ethnicity and 388 children of non-Western ethnicity (mean age 9.9 years at baseline) and their parents.
Children of non-Western ethnicity in the intervention group reported a significantly higher vegetable intake (difference = 20.7 g day-1, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 7.6-33.7). A significant positive intervention effect was also found for fruit intake for children of Dutch ethnicity (difference = 0.23 pieces day-1, 95% CI = 0.07-0.39). No significant effects in intake were observed based on parent reports. Significant positive intervention effects were also found for perceived accessibility among children of non-Western ethnicity, as well as for parent-reported taste preference of their child among children of non-Western ethnicity and boys of Dutch ethnicity.
Providing children with free F&V had some positive effects on child-reported intakes and important correlates of intakes.
评估一项以小学为基础的干预措施的效果,该措施分别为荷兰裔和非西方族裔的儿童提供免费水果和蔬菜(F&V)。
荷兰两个地区(西部和东部)的小学。
参与研究的学童及其父母在基线时和1年后完成问卷调查,包括关于通常的水果和蔬菜摄入量、潜在决定因素和一般人口统计学的问题。主要结局是通过家长和儿童自我报告的食物频率测量法评估的通常水果摄入量和通常蔬菜摄入量。次要结局指标是儿童或家长报告的口味偏好、每日推荐量的知识、可获得性以及水果摄入的可及性。使用多水平回归分析来评估随访时对照组和干预组之间经基线值调整后的差异,同时采用儿童和家长报告的数据。
565名荷兰裔儿童和388名非西方族裔儿童(基线时平均年龄9.9岁)及其父母。
干预组中非西方族裔儿童报告的蔬菜摄入量显著更高(差异=20.7克/天,95%置信区间(CI)=7.6-33.7)。荷兰裔儿童的水果摄入量也发现有显著的积极干预效果(差异=0.23份/天,95%CI=0.07-0.39)。基于家长报告未观察到摄入量有显著影响。在非西方族裔儿童中,还发现了对感知可及性的显著积极干预效果,以及在非西方族裔儿童和荷兰裔男孩中,家长报告的其孩子的口味偏好也有显著积极干预效果。
为儿童提供免费的水果和蔬菜对儿童报告的摄入量及摄入量的重要相关因素有一些积极影响。