Kalita J, Misra U K, Das M
Department of Neurology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical sciences, Lucknow 226014, India.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;79(3):289-93. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.118000. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
The diagnostic yield of various neurophysiological criteria may vary in different subforms of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), whose prevalence varies in different geographical areas.
To evaluate the sensitivity of various neurophysiological criteria in different clinical subtypes of GBS, and their relationship with severity, duration and outcome.
Consecutive patients with GBS underwent detailed clinical evaluation. Severity was graded on a scale from 0 to 10. Motor and sensory nerve conductions and F wave studies were performed. The diagnostic sensitivity of Albers et al (set 1), Cornblath (set 2), Ho et al (set 3), Dutch GBS study group (set 4), Italian GBS study group (set 5) and Albers and Kelly (set 6) criteria were evaluated and correlated with clinical subtypes of GBS, duration, severity and outcome.
There were 51 patients. Mean disability was 6.8; 34 patients were bedridden and five needed a ventilator. Clinical presentation was pure motor in 31, motorsensory in 18 and pure sensory in two patients. The sensitivity of nerve conduction study in the diagnosis of GBS was highest in set 1 (88.2%) followed by set 3 (86.3%) and set 4 (82.4%) and lowest in set 2 (39.2%). The diagnostic yield of sets 1, 3 and 4 were also higher than sets 2, 5 and 6 in different clinical subtypes of GBS. As per Ho et al, patients could be categorised into acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (44 (86.3%)), acute motor axonal neuropathy (4 (7.8%)) and acute motor sensory axonal neuropathy (3 (5.9%)). One (2%) patient died, 22.4% had complete, 57.1% partial and 18.4% poor recovery at 3 months. Outcome was related to severity of illness and compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude.
The sensitivity of different neurophysiological criteria in the diagnosis of Indian GBS patients varied from 39.2% to 88.2%. The outcome was related to severity of illness and CMAP amplitude.
在不同地理区域患病率各异的吉兰 - 巴雷综合征(GBS)的不同亚组中,各种神经生理学标准的诊断阳性率可能有所不同。
评估各种神经生理学标准在GBS不同临床亚型中的敏感性,以及它们与严重程度、病程和预后的关系。
对连续的GBS患者进行详细的临床评估。严重程度按0至10分进行分级。进行运动和感觉神经传导以及F波研究。评估阿尔伯斯等人(第1组)、科恩布拉思(第2组)、何等人(第3组)、荷兰GBS研究组(第4组)、意大利GBS研究组(第5组)和阿尔伯斯与凯利(第6组)标准的诊断敏感性,并将其与GBS的临床亚型、病程、严重程度和预后相关联。
共有51例患者。平均残疾评分为6.8;34例患者卧床不起,5例需要呼吸机支持。临床表现为单纯运动型31例,运动感觉型18例,单纯感觉型2例。神经传导研究对GBS诊断的敏感性在第1组最高(88.2%),其次是第3组(86.3%)和第4组(82.4%),在第2组最低(39.2%)。在GBS的不同临床亚型中,第1组、第3组和第4组的诊断阳性率也高于第2组、第5组和第6组。根据何等人的标准,患者可分为急性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经根神经病(44例(86.3%))、急性运动轴索性神经病(4例(7.8%))和急性运动感觉轴索性神经病(3例(5.9%))。1例(2%)患者死亡,3个月时22.4%完全恢复,57.1%部分恢复,18.4%恢复不佳。预后与疾病严重程度和复合肌肉动作电位(CMAP)波幅有关。
不同神经生理学标准对印度GBS患者诊断的敏感性在39.2%至88.2%之间。预后与疾病严重程度和CMAP波幅有关。