Passman Marc A, Fleser Paul S, Dattilo Jeffery B, Guzman Raul J, Naslund Thomas C
Section of Vascular Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, BDB 503, 1808 7th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-0012, USA.
Am J Surg. 2007 Aug;194(2):212-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.11.029.
The impact of high-fidelity simulators as an adjunct for endovascular training of general surgery residents has not yet been defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate general surgery resident perspectives on the value of a simulator-based endovascular training program by using various measurement tools.
General surgery residents in postgraduate years 1 to 5 (n = 50) participated in a focused endovascular training course covering aortoiliac, renal, and carotid artery disease. The components of the course included didactic lecture, self-learning course material and computer training modules, hands-on exposure to endovascular instruments, and endovascular procedure simulation using a mobile SimSuite unit (Medical Simulation Corporation, Denver, CO). Course participants completed pre- and postcourse questionnaires, knowledge-based testing, and endovascular simulator metric testing.
Of the 50 general surgery residents who completed the precourse questionnaire and knowledge-based testing, 41 completed the entire program including the postcourse questionnaire and knowledge-based testing, and 33 completed endovascular simulation metric testing. Subjective responses from pre- and postcourse surveys highlighting the residents' perceptions of the potential role of endovascular simulation as part of general surgery residency training showed favorable responses. On completion of the course, mean knowledge-based test scores had statistically significant improvement (pretest, n = 50, 59.5% +/- 12.1% correct and posttest, n = 41, 69.1% +/- 15.4% correct [P = .003]). For metric testing of a simulated endovascular procedure (n = 33), 93.9% completed all of the defined tasks within the allotted time period (mean time, 12.2 +/- 4.36 minutes; range, 4.1-26.6 minutes; 95% confidence interval for mean 10.8-13.6 minutes).
Based on subjective and objective measures, general surgery residents found valuable and benefited in knowledge base from a focused simulator-based endovascular training program. Integrating endovascular simulation into general surgery resident training and its influence on resident interest in vascular specialization as a career choice holds future potential.
高保真模拟器作为普通外科住院医师血管内介入培训辅助工具的作用尚未明确。本研究的目的是通过使用各种测量工具,评估普通外科住院医师对基于模拟器的血管内介入培训项目价值的看法。
1至5年级的普通外科住院医师(n = 50)参加了一个重点血管内介入培训课程,内容涵盖主髂动脉、肾动脉和颈动脉疾病。课程组成部分包括理论讲座、自学课程材料和计算机培训模块、亲身体验血管内器械以及使用移动SimSuite装置(Medical Simulation Corporation,丹佛,科罗拉多州)进行血管内介入操作模拟。课程参与者完成了课前和课后问卷、知识测试以及血管内介入模拟器指标测试。
在完成课前问卷和知识测试的50名普通外科住院医师中,41人完成了整个项目,包括课后问卷和知识测试,33人完成了血管内介入模拟指标测试。课前和课后调查的主观反馈突出了住院医师对血管内介入模拟作为普通外科住院医师培训一部分的潜在作用的看法,显示出积极的反应。课程结束时,基于知识测试的平均分数有统计学意义的提高(课前,n = 50,正确率59.5%±12.1%;课后,n = 41,正确率69.1%±15.4%[P = .003])。对于模拟血管内介入操作的指标测试(n = 33),93.9%的人在规定时间内完成了所有规定任务(平均时间,12.2±4.36分钟;范围,4.1 - 26.6分钟;平均时间的95%置信区间为10.8 - 13.6分钟)。
基于主观和客观测量,普通外科住院医师认为基于模拟器的重点血管内介入培训项目有价值且在知识库方面有所收获。将血管内介入模拟纳入普通外科住院医师培训及其对住院医师将血管专科作为职业选择兴趣的影响具有未来潜力。