• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性重型创伤性脑损伤随机对照试验中时间框架的伦理意义

Ethical implications of time frames in a randomized controlled trial in acute severe traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Kompanje Erwin J O, Maas Andrew I R, Slieker François J A, Stocchetti Nino

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands, and Ospedale Policlinico IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Prog Brain Res. 2007;161:243-50. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)61017-0.

DOI:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)61017-0
PMID:17618982
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To analyze factors determining the time between injury and study drug administration (SDA) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of acute severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to discuss the ethical implications.

METHODS

Time frames prior to SDA, differentiated per country, were analyzed in a recently conducted RCT in severe TBI. Per protocol, the time window for SDA was 6 h after injury. We selected patients for whom written proxy consent (PC) was obtained prior to SDA (n=631).

RESULTS

The time between injury and admission to the neurotrauma center (NTC) varied per country from 1.16 to 2.35 h, but CT scan was obtained on average within 1h of admission. The median time between injury and CT scan was within 3 h in all but one country. The broadest time window was observed between CT scan and obtaining required PC (1.71-2.74 h). The median time between injury and PC varied between countries from 3.75 to 5.00 h. After consent had been obtained, almost all patients subsequently received study drug within 1 h. In 85.3% of all cases time between injury and SDA exceeded 4 h, in 60% 5 h.

CONCLUSIONS

The requirement of written PC causes a significant delay in SDA in TBI. With deferred consent, the first dose of an investigational drug could potentially be administered directly after completion of the admission CT scan, which reduce the time to SDA by 50%. We argue that randomization under deferred consent is ethically defendable for emergency research in severe TBI. Recommendations for patient protection are proposed.

摘要

目的

在一项急性重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的随机对照试验(RCT)中,分析决定受伤至研究药物给药(SDA)时间的因素,并探讨其伦理意义。

方法

在最近一项针对重度TBI的RCT中,分析了各国在SDA之前的时间框架。根据方案,SDA的时间窗为受伤后6小时。我们选择了在SDA之前获得书面代理同意(PC)的患者(n = 631)。

结果

各国从受伤到进入神经创伤中心(NTC)的时间从1.16至2.35小时不等,但平均在入院后1小时内进行了CT扫描。除一个国家外,所有国家受伤至CT扫描的中位时间均在3小时内。在CT扫描和获得所需PC之间观察到最宽的时间窗(1.71 - 2.74小时)。各国受伤至PC的中位时间从3.75至5.00小时不等。获得同意后,几乎所有患者随后在1小时内接受了研究药物。在所有病例中,85.3%的受伤至SDA时间超过4小时,60%超过5小时。

结论

书面PC的要求导致TBI患者SDA出现显著延迟。采用延迟同意,在入院CT扫描完成后可直接给予研究药物的首剂,这可将SDA时间缩短50%。我们认为,对于重度TBI的急诊研究,延迟同意下的随机分组在伦理上是合理的。并提出了保护患者的建议。

相似文献

1
Ethical implications of time frames in a randomized controlled trial in acute severe traumatic brain injury.急性重型创伤性脑损伤随机对照试验中时间框架的伦理意义
Prog Brain Res. 2007;161:243-50. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)61017-0.
2
Ethical considerations on consent procedures for emergency research in severe and moderate traumatic brain injury.关于重度和中度创伤性脑损伤紧急研究同意程序的伦理考量
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005 Jun;147(6):633-9; discussion 639-40. doi: 10.1007/s00701-005-0525-3. Epub 2005 Apr 7.
3
Finding family for prospective consent in emergency research.在紧急情况下的研究中寻找家属以获取前瞻性同意。
Clin Trials. 2007;4(6):631-7. doi: 10.1177/1740774507084977.
4
Early decompressive craniectomy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury and refractory intracranial hypertension--a pilot randomized trial.早期减压性颅骨切除术治疗重度创伤性脑损伤合并难治性颅内高压——一项初步随机试验
J Crit Care. 2008 Sep;23(3):387-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.05.002. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
5
Blast injury in a civilian trauma setting is associated with a delay in diagnosis of traumatic brain injury.在平民创伤环境中,爆炸伤与创伤性脑损伤的诊断延迟有关。
Am Surg. 2008 Mar;74(3):267-70.
6
Deferred proxy consent in emergency critical care research: ethically valid and practically feasible.急诊重症监护研究中的延迟代理同意:伦理上有效且实际可行。
Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan;37(1 Suppl):S65-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181920851.
7
The optimal dosage and window of opportunity to maintain mitochondrial homeostasis following traumatic brain injury using the uncoupler FCCP.使用解偶联剂FCCP维持创伤性脑损伤后线粒体稳态的最佳剂量和时机窗。
Exp Neurol. 2009 Aug;218(2):381-9. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.05.023. Epub 2009 May 27.
8
Rehabilitation of traumatic brain injury in active duty military personnel and veterans: Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center randomized controlled trial of two rehabilitation approaches.现役军人和退伍军人创伤性脑损伤的康复:国防与退伍军人脑损伤中心对两种康复方法的随机对照试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Dec;89(12):2227-38. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.015.
9
[Clinical trials on medical products for human use in the case of acutely incapacitated patients within the fields of neurology and neurosurgery; implications of the new European legislation].[针对神经学和神经外科领域急性失能患者的人用医疗产品临床试验;欧洲新法规的影响]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Aug 16;147(33):1585-9.
10
Spinal cord injury and co-occurring traumatic brain injury: assessment and incidence.脊髓损伤与并发创伤性脑损伤:评估与发病率
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jul;89(7):1350-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.055.

引用本文的文献

1
The faster the better? Time to first CT scan after admission in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury and its association with mortality.更快更好?中重度创伤性脑损伤患者入院后首次 CT 扫描时间及其与死亡率的关系。
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Oct;44(5):2697-2706. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01456-3. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
2
Research in Emergency and Critical Care Settings: Debates, Obstacles and Solutions.急诊与重症监护环境中的研究:争论、障碍与解决方案
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Dec;22(6):1605-1626. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9730-5. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
3
Medical research in emergency research in the European Union member states: tensions between theory and practice.
欧盟成员国的紧急研究中的医学研究:理论与实践之间的紧张关系。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Apr;40(4):496-503. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3243-6. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
4
Informed consent for clinical trials in acute coronary syndromes and stroke following the European Clinical Trials Directive: investigators' experiences and attitudes.遵循欧洲临床试验指令获取急性冠状动脉综合征和中风临床试验的知情同意:研究者的经验与态度
Trials. 2008 Jul 21;9:45. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-45.
5
'No Time to be Lost!' Ethical considerations on consent for inclusion in emergency pharmacological research in severe traumatic brain injury in the European Union.“刻不容缓!”关于欧盟严重创伤性脑损伤紧急药理学研究纳入同意的伦理考量
Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Sep;13(3):371-81. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9027-4.