Suppr超能文献

患者对结直肠癌筛查的偏好:粪便DNA检测效果如何?

Patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening: how does stool DNA testing fare?

作者信息

Schroy Paul C, Lal Subodh, Glick Julie T, Robinson Patricia A, Zamor Philippe, Heeren Timothy C

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jul;13(7):393-400.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess patient preferences for 1 of the recommended colorectal cancer screening options or stool DNA testing (sDNA), a novel noninvasive screening test.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey of ambulatory-care patients in the primary care setting.

METHODS

A decision aid was administered to eligible subjects, using a trained interviewer format. The decision aid described the pros and cons of colonoscopy, fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy plus FOBT, double-contrast barium enema, and sDNA. After reviewing the decision aid, subjects were asked to identify a preferred screening option, test features influencing their choice, and level of interest in decision making.

RESULTS

A total of 263 subjects completed the study. Colonoscopy (50.6%), sDNA (28.1%), and FOBT (18.3%) were preferred over the other screening options. Preferences were associated with race and education but not age, sex, or prior FOBT. Subjects who preferred colonoscopy rated accuracy as the most influential test feature, whereas those who preferred sDNA or FOBT rated concerns about discomfort or frequency of testing highest. Most subjects preferred a shared (54%) or patient-dominant (34%) decision-making process.

CONCLUSIONS

Colonoscopy was the most frequently preferred screening option for average risk individuals. Noninvasive stool-based tests, particularly sDNA, were identified by most individuals who preferred an alternative to colonoscopy. These findings affirm the need to elicit patient preferences when selecting a screening option and suggest that provider-patient decision making can be tailored to include fewer options.

摘要

目的

评估患者对推荐的结直肠癌筛查选项之一或粪便DNA检测(sDNA,一种新型非侵入性筛查检测)的偏好。

研究设计

对初级保健机构中门诊护理患者进行横断面调查。

方法

采用经过培训的访谈形式,向符合条件的受试者发放决策辅助工具。该决策辅助工具描述了结肠镜检查、粪便潜血检测(FOBT)、乙状结肠镜检查、乙状结肠镜检查加FOBT、双重对比钡灌肠和sDNA的优缺点。在查看决策辅助工具后,要求受试者确定首选的筛查选项、影响其选择的检测特征以及对决策的兴趣程度。

结果

共有263名受试者完成了研究。与其他筛查选项相比,结肠镜检查(50.6%)、sDNA(28.1%)和FOBT(18.3%)更受青睐。偏好与种族和教育程度有关,但与年龄、性别或既往FOBT无关。选择结肠镜检查的受试者将准确性列为最具影响力的检测特征,而选择sDNA或FOBT的受试者则将对不适或检测频率的担忧列为最高。大多数受试者倾向于共同决策(54%)或患者主导决策(34%)的过程。

结论

结肠镜检查是平均风险个体最常首选的筛查选项。大多数倾向于选择结肠镜检查以外选项的个体选择了基于粪便的非侵入性检测,尤其是sDNA。这些发现证实了在选择筛查选项时了解患者偏好的必要性,并表明医患决策可以进行调整,以减少选项数量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验