• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联邦合格医疗中心服务的黑人/非裔美国患者对基于粪便的DNA结肠癌筛查的可接受性。

Acceptability of Stool-Based DNA Colorectal Cancer Screening among Black/African-American Patients Served by Federally Qualified Health Centers.

作者信息

Keiser Evan, Corbett A Michelle, Chido-Amajuoyi Onyema, Antoine Allison, Stehman Carrie, Dorn Isabella, Goines David, LoConte Noelle K

机构信息

School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.

Center for Urban Population Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2025 May 1. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02631-0.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-025-02631-0
PMID:40307656
Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has an increased burden among Black/African-American populations. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, home-based CRC screening options are being used more frequently. We conducted focus groups to understand the acceptability of stool-based DNA testing for CRC screening in this population. Ten focus groups about the acceptability of various CRC screening modalities were held with Black/African-American participants at two federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Participants were separated into focus groups based on age and gender. Thematic analysis was carried out using NVivo. Across the groups, there were a total of 79 participants, of which 40.5% were aged 40-50 years ("younger participants"), 59.5% aged > 50 years ("older participants"), 53.2% male, and 46.8% female. Overall, knowledge was low regarding perceived risk of CRC. There was limited awareness of CRC screening options among younger patients and widespread lack of knowledge about stool-based DNA testing. Most respondents preferred colonoscopy as their first-choice screening test but were open to other screening tests. Stool-based DNA tests were more preferred among younger participants but was felt to be acceptable across all groups. Given the low awareness/knowledge of screening modalities identified in our study, educational interventions and shared decision making by primary care providers are needed.

摘要

结直肠癌(CRC)在黑人/非裔美国人群中的负担有所增加。在新冠疫情之后,基于家庭的CRC筛查选项的使用频率更高。我们开展了焦点小组讨论,以了解在该人群中基于粪便的DNA检测用于CRC筛查的可接受性。在威斯康星州密尔沃基市的两家联邦合格健康中心(FQHC),我们与黑人/非裔美国参与者就各种CRC筛查方式的可接受性举行了10次焦点小组讨论。参与者根据年龄和性别被分成不同的焦点小组。使用NVivo进行了主题分析。各小组共有79名参与者,其中40.5%的年龄在40至50岁之间(“年轻参与者”),59.5%的年龄大于50岁(“年长参与者”),53.2%为男性,46.8%为女性。总体而言,对CRC感知风险的了解程度较低。年轻患者对CRC筛查选项的知晓有限,且普遍缺乏对基于粪便的DNA检测的了解。大多数受访者更倾向于结肠镜检查作为首选筛查测试,但也对其他筛查测试持开放态度。基于粪便的DNA检测在年轻参与者中更受青睐,但在所有组中都被认为是可接受的。鉴于我们研究中发现的对筛查方式的低知晓度/了解程度,需要开展教育干预以及由初级保健提供者进行共同决策。

相似文献

1
Acceptability of Stool-Based DNA Colorectal Cancer Screening among Black/African-American Patients Served by Federally Qualified Health Centers.联邦合格医疗中心服务的黑人/非裔美国患者对基于粪便的DNA结肠癌筛查的可接受性。
J Cancer Educ. 2025 May 1. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02631-0.
2
Barriers and Facilitators to Stool-Based Screening for Colorectal Cancer Among Black Louisville Residents.黑人群体在路易维尔居民中进行粪便筛查以检测结直肠癌的障碍和促进因素。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):1050-1058. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02231-2. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
3
The Effectiveness of a Physician-Only and Physician-Patient Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussions Between Providers and African American and Latino Patients.仅医生参与及医生-患者共同参与的干预措施对医疗服务提供者与非裔美国人和拉丁裔患者之间结直肠癌筛查讨论的有效性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Dec;30(12):1780-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3381-8. Epub 2015 May 19.
4
The Development of a Digital Patient Navigation Tool to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Federally Qualified Health Center Patients: Acceptability and Usability Testing.开发数字化患者导航工具以提高符合联邦资格的健康中心患者的结直肠癌筛查率:可接受性和可用性测试。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 25;8:e53224. doi: 10.2196/53224.
5
Monthly Variations in Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests Among Federally Qualified Health Center Patients in Missouri: Quality Improvement Project.密苏里州联邦合格健康中心患者结直肠癌筛查测试的月度变化:质量改进项目
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Mar 19;11:e64809. doi: 10.2196/64809.
6
Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Black Men in Virginia: Development of an mHealth Intervention.弗吉尼亚州提高黑人男性结直肠癌筛查率:开发移动医疗干预措施。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 10;8:e50028. doi: 10.2196/50028.
7
Perceptions of colorectal cancer screening in urban African American clinic patients: differences by gender and screening status.城市非裔美国门诊患者对结直肠癌筛查的认知:按性别和筛查状态的差异
J Cancer Educ. 2011 Mar;26(1):121-8. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0123-9.
8
Centralized Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.在联邦合格健康中心开展集中结直肠癌筛查外展活动:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2446693. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46693.
9
Colon Cancer Screening - Is It Time Yet?结肠癌筛查——是时候了吗?
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2017 Jun;27(6):327-328.
10
Assessing the effectiveness of a community health advisor plus screen to save educational intervention on stool-based testing adherence in an African American safety net clinic population: study protocol for a randomized pragmatic trial.评估社区卫生顾问加筛查对非裔美国人医疗服务提供系统人群基于粪便的检测依从性的教育干预效果:一项随机实用试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Feb 15;23(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06076-4.

本文引用的文献

1
A Cell-free DNA Blood-Based Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening.基于无细胞游离 DNA 的血液检测用于结直肠癌筛查。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Mar 14;390(11):973-983. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2304714.
2
Medical mistrust, culturally targeted message framing, and colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.非裔美国人中的医疗不信任、文化针对性信息框架构建与结直肠癌筛查
J Behav Med. 2023 Oct;46(5):871-881. doi: 10.1007/s10865-023-00415-9. Epub 2023 May 4.
3
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023.2023 年结直肠癌统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 May-Jun;73(3):233-254. doi: 10.3322/caac.21772. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
4
Community Health Workers to Increase Cancer Screening: 3 Community Guide Systematic Reviews.社区卫生工作者促进癌症筛查:3 项社区指南系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Apr;64(4):579-594. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.10.016. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
5
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1978-1998. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4417.
6
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965-1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238.
7
ACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021.ACG 临床指南:结直肠癌筛查 2021 年版。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar 1;116(3):458-479. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001122.
8
Barriers Driving Racial Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening in African Americans.导致非裔美国人结直肠癌筛查中存在种族差异的障碍。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020 Jul 9;22(8):41. doi: 10.1007/s11894-020-00776-0.
9
Causes of Socioeconomic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer and Intervention Framework and Strategies.社会经济差异导致结直肠癌的原因及干预框架和策略。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(2):354-367. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.029. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
10
Creating and Implementing a National Public Health Campaign: The American Cancer Society's and National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable's 80% by 2018 Initiative.创建并实施一项全国性公共卫生运动:美国癌症协会与全国结直肠癌圆桌会议的“到2018年实现80%目标”倡议。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;113(12):1739-1741. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0384-1. Epub 2018 Nov 9.