Suppr超能文献

非黏膜局部用药后发生过敏反应、中毒性表皮坏死松解症或史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征:事实还是虚构?

Anaphylaxis and toxic epidermal necrolysis or Stevens-Johnson syndrome after nonmucosal topical drug application: fact or fiction?

作者信息

Sachs B, Fischer-Barth W, Erdmann S, Merk H F, Seebeck J

机构信息

Division of Pharmacovigilance, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Allergy. 2007 Aug;62(8):877-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01398.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced anaphylaxis and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) or Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) represent severe immediate and delayed-type adverse drug reactions (ADRs), respectively. Occurrence of such reactions after topical drug application has only rarely been reported. Hence, we compiled a large number of such cases which we systematically analyzed.

METHODS

All such cases contained in the ADR database of the competent pharmacovigilance authority in Germany and cases reported in literature were identified, evaluated and analyzed with regard to potential risk factors. Since the application of drugs to mucous membranes facilitates their entry to the systemic circulation only cases occurring after non-mucosal topical drug application were considered.

RESULTS

After evaluation 28 anaphylaxis database cases and 48 anaphylaxis literature cases remained for analysis. Application to skin wounds or to skin with impaired barrier function was identified as a risk factor in 10/28 (36%) of the database cases and in 42/48 (88%) of the literature cases. In 9/28 database cases (32%), anaphylaxis was induced by drugs used for their hyperemizing effect and, in 8/28 cases (29%) by antibiotics or antiseptics. In the literature cases, anaphylaxis was induced by antibiotics or antiseptics in 35/48 cases (73%). Only one SJS database case and one TEN literature case remained after case evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Anaphylaxis does occur after non-mucosal topical drug administration. Application of drugs to skin wounds or to skin with impaired barrier function may pose a risk factor for its occurrence. TEN or SJS following non-mucosal topical drug application seems to be extremely rare.

摘要

背景

药物性过敏反应和中毒性表皮坏死松解症(TEN)或史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征(SJS)分别代表严重的速发型和迟发型药物不良反应(ADR)。局部用药后发生此类反应的报道极为罕见。因此,我们收集了大量此类病例并进行了系统分析。

方法

从德国主管药物警戒机构的ADR数据库中识别出所有此类病例,并对文献中报道的病例进行评估和分析,以确定潜在风险因素。由于药物应用于黏膜会促进其进入体循环,因此仅考虑非黏膜局部用药后发生的病例。

结果

经评估,数据库中有28例过敏反应病例和文献中有48例过敏反应病例可供分析。在数据库病例的10/28(36%)和文献病例的42/48(88%)中,将药物应用于皮肤伤口或屏障功能受损的皮肤被确定为一个风险因素。在数据库病例的9/28(32%)中,过敏反应由具有催吐作用的药物引起,在8/28(29%)的病例中由抗生素或防腐剂引起。在文献病例中,35/48(73%)的过敏反应由抗生素或防腐剂引起。病例评估后,仅剩下1例数据库SJS病例和1例文献TEN病例。

结论

非黏膜局部用药后确实会发生过敏反应。将药物应用于皮肤伤口或屏障功能受损的皮肤可能是其发生的一个风险因素。非黏膜局部用药后发生TEN或SJS似乎极为罕见。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验