Cameron C M, Kliewer E V, Purdie D M, McClure R J
School of Medicine, Griffith University, Logan, Australia.
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2007 Mar;14(1):11-8. doi: 10.1080/17457300600890103.
Priorities for prevention activities and planning for services depend on comprehensive knowledge of the distribution of the injury-related burden in the community. The aim of this systematic review was to quantify the effect of being injured, compared with not being injured, on long-term mortality in working age adults. Cohort studies were selected that were population-based, measured mortality post-discharge from inpatient treatment, included a non-injured comparison group and related to working-age adults. Data synthesis was in tabular and text form with a meta-analysis not being possible because of the heterogeneity between studies. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies found an overall positive association between injury and increased mortality. While the greatest excess mortality was evident during the initial period post-injury, increased mortality was shown in some studies to persist for up to 40 years after injury. Due to the limited number of injury types studied and heterogeneity between studies, there is insufficient published evidence on which to calculate population estimates of long-term mortality, where injury is a component cause. The review does suggest there is considerable excess mortality following injury that is not accounted for in current methods of quantifying injury burden, and is not used to assess quality and effectiveness of trauma care.
预防活动的重点和服务规划取决于对社区中与伤害相关负担分布的全面了解。本系统评价的目的是量化受伤与未受伤相比对工作年龄成年人长期死亡率的影响。我们选择了基于人群的队列研究,这些研究测量了住院治疗出院后的死亡率,包括一个未受伤的对照组,并且与工作年龄成年人相关。由于研究之间的异质性,数据综合以表格和文本形式呈现,无法进行荟萃分析。11项研究符合纳入标准。所有研究均发现伤害与死亡率增加之间总体呈正相关。虽然在受伤后的最初阶段死亡率过高最为明显,但一些研究表明,受伤后死亡率增加可持续长达40年。由于所研究的伤害类型数量有限以及研究之间的异质性,目前尚无足够的已发表证据来计算将伤害作为一个构成原因时的长期死亡率的人群估计值。该评价确实表明,受伤后存在相当高的额外死亡率,这在当前量化伤害负担的方法中并未得到考虑,也未用于评估创伤护理的质量和效果。