• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区护理中的不良事件:制定研究议程。

Adverse events in community care: developing a research agenda.

作者信息

Masotti Paul, Green Michael, Shortt Sam, Hunter Duncan, Szala-Meneok Karen

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen's University.

出版信息

Healthc Q. 2007;10(3):63-9. doi: 10.12927/hcq..18926.

DOI:10.12927/hcq..18926
PMID:17626548
Abstract

Little is known about the extent to which adverse events compromise the quality of community care. This article describes the results of a consensus workshop in which 31 healthcare professionals were asked to identify and rank common adverse events and important research questions relating to community care. Workshop participants were decision-makers and healthcare providers with areas of expertise that included community and home care; acute and primary care; patient safety; medical errors; and health services policy, administration and research. Results include prioritized lists of adverse events, research questions and contributing factors associated with adverse events. Further study should be aimed at defining and implementing research priorities and developing standardized definitions of common adverse events associated with community care.

摘要

关于不良事件对社区护理质量的影响程度,目前所知甚少。本文描述了一次共识研讨会的结果,在该研讨会上,31名医疗保健专业人员被要求识别常见不良事件并对其进行排序,以及提出与社区护理相关的重要研究问题。研讨会参与者是决策者和医疗服务提供者,其专业领域包括社区和家庭护理;急性和初级护理;患者安全;医疗差错;以及卫生服务政策、管理和研究。结果包括不良事件的优先列表、研究问题以及与不良事件相关的促成因素。进一步的研究应旨在确定和实施研究重点,并制定与社区护理相关的常见不良事件的标准化定义。

相似文献

1
Adverse events in community care: developing a research agenda.社区护理中的不良事件:制定研究议程。
Healthc Q. 2007;10(3):63-9. doi: 10.12927/hcq..18926.
2
Adverse events in community care: implications for practice, policy and research.社区护理中的不良事件:对实践、政策和研究的启示
Healthc Q. 2009;12(1):69-76. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2009.20417.
3
A description of adverse events in home healthcare.家庭医疗保健中的不良事件描述。
Home Healthc Nurse. 2007 Mar;25(3):191-7. doi: 10.1097/01.NHH.0000263437.08062.cc.
4
Wiisokotaatiwin: development and evaluation of a community-based palliative care program in Naotkamegwanning First Nation.威索科塔蒂温:在瑙特卡梅格万宁第一民族开展的基于社区的姑息治疗项目的开发与评估
Rural Remote Health. 2018 Apr;18(2):4317. doi: 10.22605/RRH4317. Epub 2018 Apr 28.
5
Formal care providers' perceptions of home- and community-based services: informing dementia care quality.正规护理服务提供者对家庭和社区服务的看法:对痴呆症护理质量的影响
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2009;28(1):1-23. doi: 10.1080/01621420802700952.
6
Emergency medical and health providers' perceptions of key issues in prehospital patient safety.紧急医疗和卫生提供者对院前患者安全关键问题的看法。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jan-Mar;14(1):95-102. doi: 10.3109/10903120903349887.
7
Prioritizing Possibilities for Child and Family Health: An Agenda to Address Adverse Childhood Experiences and Foster the Social and Emotional Roots of Well-being in Pediatrics.优先考虑儿童和家庭健康的可能性:解决不良儿童经历问题并促进儿科学中幸福感的社会和情感根源的议程。
Acad Pediatr. 2017 Sep-Oct;17(7S):S36-S50. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.06.002.
8
Task shifting in the provision of home and social care in Ontario, Canada: implications for quality of care.加拿大安大略省居家和社会护理服务中的任务转移:对护理质量的影响。
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 Sep;23(5):485-92. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12168. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
9
Mapping a research agenda for home care safety: perspectives from researchers, providers, and decision makers.制定家庭护理安全研究议程:来自研究人员、提供者和决策者的观点
Can J Aging. 2011 Jun;30(2):233-45. doi: 10.1017/S0714980811000055.
10
Patient Safety Organizations and Emergency Medical Services.患者安全组织与紧急医疗服务
J Allied Health. 2016 Winter;45(4):274-277.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptation of Caregivers of Individuals on Mechanical Ventilation to Caregiving Role.机械通气患者照顾者对照顾角色的适应
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan;28(1):41-47. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24596.
2
Home mechanical ventilation: A retrospective review of safety incidents using the World Health Organization International Patient Safety Event classification.家庭机械通气:使用世界卫生组织国际患者安全事件分类法对安全事件进行的回顾性研究。
Can J Respir Ther. 2016 Fall;52(3):85-91. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
3
Use of participatory visual narrative methods to explore older adults' experiences of managing multiple chronic conditions during care transitions.
运用参与式视觉叙事方法探索老年人在护理过渡期间管理多种慢性病的经历。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 20;18(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3292-6.
4
Seniors managing multiple medications: using mixed methods to view the home care safety lens.管理多种药物的老年人:运用混合方法审视居家护理安全视角。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 12;15:548. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1193-5.
5
A comparison of home care quality indicator rates in two Canadian provinces.加拿大两个省份家庭护理质量指标率的比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 25;14:37. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-37.
6
The development of remote monitoring and guideline system for safer client care in the community.用于社区更安全客户护理的远程监测与指导系统的开发。
NI 2012 (2012). 2012 Jun 23;2012:401. eCollection 2012.
7
Home mechanical ventilation: a Canadian Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline.家庭机械通气:加拿大胸科学会临床实践指南。
Can Respir J. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):197-215. doi: 10.1155/2011/139769.
8
Improving Drug Benefits for Children with Asthma: Results of a Multi-stakeholder Workshop to Build a Research Agenda.改善哮喘儿童的药物疗效:建立研究议程的多方利益相关者研讨会成果
Healthc Policy. 2008 May;3(4):66-77.