School of Community and Health Studies, Centennial College, Ontario, Canada.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jan-Mar;14(1):95-102. doi: 10.3109/10903120903349887.
To date, most patient safety studies have been conducted in relation to the hospital rather than the prehospital setting and data regarding emergency medical services (EMS)-related errors are limited. To address this gap, a study was conducted to gain an in-depth understanding of the views of highly experienced EMS practitioners, educators, administrators, and physicians on major issues pertaining to EMS patient safety. The intent of the study was to identify key issues to give direction to the development of best practices in education, policy, and fieldwork.
A qualitative study was conducted using processes described by Lincoln and Guba (1985) to enhance the quality and credibility of data and analysis. Purposive sampling was used to identify informants with knowledge and expertise regarding policy, practice, and research who could speak to the issue of patient safety. Sixteen participants, the majority of whom were Canadian, participated in in-depth interviews.
Two major themes were identified under the category of key issues: clinical decision making and EMS's focus and relationship with health care. An education gap has developed in EMS, and there is tension between the traditional stabilize-and-transport role and the increasingly complex role that has come about through "scope creep." If, as expected, EMS aligns increasingly with the health sector, then change is needed in the EMS educational structure and process to develop stronger clinical decision-making skills.
The results of this study indicate that many individual organizations and health regions are addressing issues related to patient safety in EMS, and there are important lessons to be learned from these groups. The broader issues identified, however, are system-wide and best addressed through policy change from health regions and government.
迄今为止,大多数患者安全研究都是针对医院而不是院前环境进行的,关于紧急医疗服务(EMS)相关错误的数据有限。为了弥补这一空白,进行了一项研究,以便深入了解经验丰富的 EMS 从业者、教育工作者、管理人员和医生对与 EMS 患者安全相关的主要问题的看法。该研究旨在确定关键问题,为教育、政策和现场工作的最佳实践提供指导。
使用 Lincoln 和 Guba(1985)描述的过程进行了定性研究,以提高数据和分析的质量和可信度。采用目的性抽样来确定具有政策、实践和研究知识和专业知识的信息提供者,以便能够讨论患者安全问题。16 名参与者参加了深度访谈,其中大多数是加拿大人。
在关键问题类别下确定了两个主要主题:临床决策制定和 EMS 的重点以及与医疗保健的关系。EMS 教育中出现了差距,传统的稳定和转运角色与通过“范围扩大”而产生的日益复杂的角色之间存在紧张关系。如果如预期的那样,EMS 与卫生部门越来越一致,那么 EMS 教育结构和过程需要改变,以培养更强的临床决策技能。
这项研究的结果表明,许多单独的组织和卫生区域正在解决 EMS 中与患者安全相关的问题,并且可以从这些群体中吸取重要的经验教训。然而,更广泛的问题是系统性的,最好通过卫生区域和政府的政策变革来解决。