• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定家庭护理安全研究议程:来自研究人员、提供者和决策者的观点

Mapping a research agenda for home care safety: perspectives from researchers, providers, and decision makers.

作者信息

Macdonald Marilyn, Lang Ariella, MacDonald Jo-Anne

机构信息

School of Nursing at Dalhousie University.

Research Scientist Victorian Order of Nurses Canada.

出版信息

Can J Aging. 2011 Jun;30(2):233-45. doi: 10.1017/S0714980811000055.

DOI:10.1017/S0714980811000055
PMID:24650672
Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative interpretive design was to explore the perspectives of researchers, health care providers, policy makers, and decision makers on key risks, concerns, and emerging issues related to home care safety that would inform a line of research inquiry. Defining safety specifically in this home care context has yet to be described; consequently, gaining insight from various stakeholders about safety issues relevant to the home care sector is necessary in order to inform strategic directions for future research. To begin to map a research agenda, a three-part environmental scan was conducted: (a) a pilot study with home care recipients and providers; (b) key informant interviews with researchers, health care providers, policy makers, and decision makers; and (c) a review of literature in three topic areas. Only the results of the key informant interviews are reported here.

摘要

这种质性解释性设计的目的是探究研究人员、医疗保健提供者、政策制定者和决策者对于与家庭护理安全相关的关键风险、问题及新出现问题的看法,从而为一系列研究探究提供信息。在家庭护理背景下对安全进行具体界定的情况尚未得到描述;因此,有必要从不同利益相关者那里了解与家庭护理部门相关的安全问题,以便为未来研究的战略方向提供信息。为了初步制定研究议程,进行了三部分的环境扫描:(a) 对家庭护理接受者和提供者的试点研究;(b) 对研究人员、医疗保健提供者、政策制定者和决策者的关键 informant 访谈;(c) 对三个主题领域文献的综述。这里仅报告关键 informant 访谈的结果。

相似文献

1
Mapping a research agenda for home care safety: perspectives from researchers, providers, and decision makers.制定家庭护理安全研究议程:来自研究人员、提供者和决策者的观点
Can J Aging. 2011 Jun;30(2):233-45. doi: 10.1017/S0714980811000055.
2
Home care safety perspectives from clients, family members, caregivers and paid providers.客户、家庭成员、护理人员和付费服务提供者对家庭护理安全的看法。
Healthc Q. 2009;12 Spec No Patient:97-101. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2009.20720.
3
Views and experiences of decision-makers on organisational safety culture and medication errors.决策者对组织安全文化和用药错误的看法与经验。
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Sep;74(9):e13560. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13560. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
4
Involving decision-makers in the research process: Challenges of implementing the accountability for reasonableness approach to priority setting at the district level in Tanzania.让决策者参与研究过程:在坦桑尼亚地区层面实施合理性问责制以确定优先事项所面临的挑战。
Glob Public Health. 2014;9(7):760-72. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.922208. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
5
Safety issues at the end of life in the home setting.家庭环境中临终阶段的安全问题。
Home Healthc Nurse. 2014 Jul-Aug;32(7):396-401. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000105.
6
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
7
A critical policy analysis of an emerging agenda for home care in one Canadian province.对加拿大一个省份新兴家庭护理议程的批判性政策分析。
Health Soc Care Community. 2006 May;14(3):242-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00616.x.
8
Types and patterns of safety concerns in home care: staff perspectives.家庭护理中的安全问题的类型和模式:工作人员的观点。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Oct;24(5):525-31. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs047. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
9
How does context influence collaborative decision-making for health services planning, delivery and evaluation?背景如何影响卫生服务规划、提供和评估中的协作决策?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 19;14:545. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0545-x.
10
Program and policy issues affecting home and community-based long-term care use: findings from a qualitative study.影响家庭和社区长期护理使用的计划与政策问题:一项定性研究的结果
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2006;25(3-4):107-27. doi: 10.1300/J027v25n03_07.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on Abuse in Home Care: A Scoping Review.家庭护理中的虐待问题研究:一项范围综述
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Apr;25(2):885-897. doi: 10.1177/15248380231165922. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
2
Communication on Safe Caregiving between Community Nurse Case Managers and Family Caregivers.社区护士个案管理员与家庭照顾者之间关于安全照护的沟通
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 14;9(2):205. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020205.
3
Types and patterns of safety concerns in home care: client and family caregiver perspectives.居家护理中安全问题的类型与模式:客户及家庭照顾者的观点
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Apr;28(2):214-20. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw006. Epub 2016 Jan 31.
4
Seniors managing multiple medications: using mixed methods to view the home care safety lens.管理多种药物的老年人:运用混合方法审视居家护理安全视角。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 12;15:548. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1193-5.
5
Examining markers of safety in homecare using the international classification for patient safety.使用国际患者安全分类检查家庭护理中的安全标志物。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 May 24;13:191. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-191.