Kluge Eike-Henner W
Department of Philosophy, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C V8W 3P4, Canada.
Health Care Anal. 2007 Jun;15(2):73-89. doi: 10.1007/s10728-007-0046-8.
Sex selection, which refers to the attempt to choose or control the sex of a child prior to its birth, has become the subject of increasing ethical scrutiny and many jurisdictions have criminalized it except for serious sex-linked diseases or conditions that cannot easily be ameliorated or remedied. This paper argues that such a blanket prohibition is ethically unwarranted because it is based on a flawed understanding of the difference between sexist values and mere sex-oriented preferences. It distinguishes between ethics and public policy, and suggests a way of allowing preference-based sex selection as a matter of public policy without permitting value-based sex selection. It further argues that medically-based sex selection should be publicly funded but that preference-base sex selection should not be paid for by society, and that the prohibition against value-based sex selection should be enforced through legislation that controls the licensing of health care facilities and through disciplinary procedures against health care professionals.
性别选择是指在孩子出生前试图选择或控制其性别的行为,这已成为越来越多伦理审查的对象,除了严重的与性别相关且难以轻易改善或补救的疾病或状况外,许多司法管辖区已将其定为犯罪行为。本文认为,这种一概而论的禁令在伦理上是没有正当理由的,因为它基于对性别歧视价值观和单纯的性别取向偏好之间差异的错误理解。本文区分了伦理和公共政策,并提出了一种方法,即作为公共政策允许基于偏好的性别选择,同时不允许基于价值观的性别选择。本文进一步认为,基于医学的性别选择应由公共资金资助,但基于偏好的性别选择不应由社会支付费用,并且应通过控制医疗保健机构许可的立法以及针对医疗保健专业人员的纪律程序来执行对基于价值观的性别选择的禁令。