Schwartz Thue W, Holst Birgitte
Laboratory for Molecular Pharmacology, Institute of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2007 Aug;28(8):366-73. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2007.06.008. Epub 2007 Jul 13.
Many small-molecule agonists also display allosteric properties. Such ago-allosteric modulators act as co-agonists, providing additive efficacy--instead of partial antagonism--and they can affect--and often improve--the potency of the endogenous agonist. Surprisingly, the apparent binding sites of several ordinary allosteric enhancers and ago-allosteric modulators seem to overlap with those of the endogenous agonists. Different molecular scenarios are proposed to explain this discrepancy from classical allosteric models. In one scenario, the ago-allosteric modulator can interchange between different binding modes. In another, dimeric, receptor scenario, the endogenous agonist binds to one protomer while the ago-allosteric modulator binds to the other, 'allosteric' protomer. It is suggested that testing for ago-allosteric properties should be an integral part of the agonist drug discovery process because a compound that acts with--rather than against--the endogenous agonist could be an optimal agonist drug.
许多小分子激动剂也表现出变构特性。这类前变构调节剂作为协同激动剂,可提供相加效应(而非部分拮抗作用),并且它们能够影响(且常常提高)内源性激动剂的效力。令人惊讶的是,几种普通变构增强剂和前变构调节剂的表观结合位点似乎与内源性激动剂的结合位点重叠。人们提出了不同的分子模型来解释这种与经典变构模型的差异。在一种模型中,前变构调节剂可以在不同的结合模式之间互换。在另一种二聚体受体模型中,内源性激动剂与一个原体结合,而前变构调节剂与另一个“变构”原体结合。有人认为,检测前变构特性应成为激动剂药物发现过程中不可或缺的一部分,因为与内源性激动剂协同作用(而非拮抗)的化合物可能是最佳的激动剂药物。