Baker Jillian G, Hill Stephen J
Institute of Cell Signalling, Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2007 Aug;28(8):374-81. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2007.06.011. Epub 2007 Jul 13.
Antagonist affinity measurements have traditionally been considered important in characterizing the cell-surface receptors present in a particular cell or tissue. A central assumption has been that antagonist affinity is constant for a given receptor-antagonist interaction, regardless of the agonist used to stimulate that receptor or the downstream response that is measured. As a consequence, changes in antagonist affinity values have been taken as initial evidence for the presence of novel receptor subtypes. Emerging evidence suggests, however, that receptors can possess multiple binding sites and the same receptor can show different antagonist affinity measurements under distinct experimental conditions. Here, we discuss several mechanisms by which antagonists have different affinities for the same receptor as a consequence of allosterism, coupling to different G proteins, multiple (but non-interacting) receptor sites, and signal-pathway-dependent pharmacology (where the pharmacology observed varies depending on the signalling pathway measured).
传统上,拮抗剂亲和力测量在表征特定细胞或组织中存在的细胞表面受体方面被认为很重要。一个核心假设是,对于给定的受体 - 拮抗剂相互作用,拮抗剂亲和力是恒定的,无论用于刺激该受体的激动剂或所测量的下游反应如何。因此,拮抗剂亲和力值的变化被视为存在新型受体亚型的初步证据。然而,新出现的证据表明,受体可以拥有多个结合位点,并且在不同的实验条件下,同一受体可以表现出不同的拮抗剂亲和力测量值。在这里,我们讨论了几种机制,由于变构作用、与不同G蛋白偶联、多个(但不相互作用)受体位点以及信号通路依赖性药理学(其中观察到的药理学取决于所测量的信号通路),拮抗剂对同一受体具有不同的亲和力。