Cicinelli Ettore, Rossi A Cristina, Marinaccio Marco, Matteo Maria, Saliani Nicola, Tinelli Raffaele
Fourth Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(4):485-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.03.008.
Fluid minihysteroscopy is in most cases a painless procedure. However, rarely, severe pain and side effects are reported. The goal of this study was to identify predictive factors of pain at minihysteroscopy.
Prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
Academic environment.
Five hundred thirty-three women undergoing fluid minihysteroscopy.
Diagnostic fluid minihysteroscopy.
The women were asked to score pain perception on a visual analog scale from zero (no pain) to 5 (unbearable pain). Correlation between pain at procedure and parity, previous cesarean section (PCS), menopausal status, anxiety, and chronic pelvic pain (CPP) was evaluated. Four hundred thirteen women (78%) reported no pain or discomfort (0-1 pain score, group A), while 120 (22%) experienced mild to unbearable pain (2-5 pain score, group B). Instances of PCS, CPP, anxiety, and menopause were significantly lower in group A than in group B (4% vs 82%, 0% vs 29%, 62% vs 72%, 25% vs 72%, respectively), whereas menopausal status was less frequent in group A (25.2%) than in group B (72.5%). At binary logistic regression, all the variables were independent risk factors for pain; however, when CPP was stratified for intensity, no correlation between pain at procedure and intensity of CPP was found.
Previous cesarean section, CPP, anxiety, and menopause are predictive factors for pain perception during fluid minihysteroscopy, and history of CPP even of low intensity is predictive of pain at hysteroscopy. These patients may benefit from local anesthesia.
在大多数情况下,液体微型宫腔镜检查是一种无痛手术。然而,很少有严重疼痛和副作用的报告。本研究的目的是确定微型宫腔镜检查时疼痛的预测因素。
前瞻性研究(加拿大工作组分类II-2)。
学术环境。
533名接受液体微型宫腔镜检查的女性。
诊断性液体微型宫腔镜检查。
要求这些女性在视觉模拟量表上对疼痛感知进行评分,范围从0(无疼痛)到5(无法忍受的疼痛)。评估手术时的疼痛与产次、既往剖宫产史(PCS)、绝经状态、焦虑和慢性盆腔疼痛(CPP)之间的相关性。413名女性(78%)报告无疼痛或不适(疼痛评分为0-1分,A组),而120名(22%)经历了轻度至无法忍受的疼痛(疼痛评分为2-5分,B组)。A组的PCS、CPP、焦虑和绝经情况显著低于B组(分别为4%对82%、0%对29%、62%对72%、25%对72%),而A组的绝经状态比B组(72.5%)少见(25.2%)。在二元逻辑回归分析中,所有变量都是疼痛的独立危险因素;然而,当对CPP的强度进行分层时,未发现手术时的疼痛与CPP强度之间存在相关性。
既往剖宫产史、CPP、焦虑和绝经是液体微型宫腔镜检查时疼痛感知的预测因素,即使是低强度的CPP病史也可预测宫腔镜检查时的疼痛。这些患者可能受益于局部麻醉。