Scales Charles D, Preminger Glenn M, Keitz Sheri A, Dahm Philipp
Department of Surgery, Division of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):775-82. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.020. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
Evidence based clinical practice has been defined as the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of the current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. It refers to a broad set of principles and methods intended to ensure that medical decisions, guidelines and health policy are based on well designed studies of therapeutic effectiveness and benefit.
We review the principles and practice of evidence based clinical practice using examples from the urology literature. We further provide a guide to currently available web based evidence based clinical practice resources and guidelines for urologists.
Evidence based clinical practice integrates a hierarchy of evidence and patient values with practitioner judgment to guide decision making for the individual patient. Important steps in the evidence based clinical practice process include the formulation of an answerable question and a systematic search of the literature. In the absence of pre-appraised evidence or disease specific guidelines, the practice of evidence based clinical practice relies heavily on the evaluation of the primary literature by the individual urologist. Depending on the question domain (therapy/prevention, etiology/cause/harm, diagnosis or prognosis) and study design, a given study is critically appraised for validity, impact and applicability. Evidence is then integrated with clinical judgment, and patient circumstances and preferences. Finally, the practice of evidence based clinical practice includes a self-assessment of provider performance.
Knowledge, practice and documentation of evidence based clinical practice are of increasing importance to every urologist. Urologists should embrace evidence based clinical practice principles by acquiring the necessary skills to critically appraise the literature for the best evidence applicable to patient care.
循证临床实践被定义为在对个体患者的护理决策中审慎、明确且明智地运用当前最佳证据。它指的是一系列广泛的原则和方法,旨在确保医疗决策、指南及卫生政策基于精心设计的治疗效果和益处研究。
我们运用泌尿外科文献中的实例回顾循证临床实践的原则与实践。我们还为泌尿外科医生提供了一份关于当前可用的基于网络的循证临床实践资源及指南的指南。
循证临床实践将证据等级体系、患者价值观与从业者的判断相结合,以指导个体患者的决策制定。循证临床实践过程中的重要步骤包括提出可回答的问题以及对文献进行系统检索。在缺乏预先评估的证据或疾病特异性指南的情况下,循证临床实践在很大程度上依赖于个体泌尿外科医生对原始文献的评估。根据问题领域(治疗/预防、病因/原因/危害、诊断或预后)和研究设计,对给定的研究进行有效性、影响力和适用性的严格评估。然后将证据与临床判断、患者情况及偏好相结合。最后,循证临床实践包括对医疗服务提供者表现的自我评估。
循证临床实践的知识、实践及记录对每位泌尿外科医生而言愈发重要。泌尿外科医生应通过掌握必要技能来严格评估文献以获取适用于患者护理的最佳证据,从而接受循证临床实践原则。