Suppr超能文献

基于手动与基于自动化测量处于水肿状态变化的患者的QRS波群和T波振幅:临床意义

Manual-based versus automation-based measurements of the amplitude of QRS complexes and T waves in patients with changing edematous states: clinical implications.

作者信息

Madias John E

机构信息

Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Electrocardiol. 2008 Jan-Feb;41(1):15-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2007.05.009. Epub 2007 Jul 13.

Abstract

Most of the previous work pertaining to the impact of peripheral edema on the ECG has been based on manual measurements. Comparison of manual- and automation-based measurements of P waves has been previously carried out. The objective of this study was to compare manual and automated measurements of QRS complexes and T waves. The sum of the amplitude of QRS complexes for manual (SigmaQRSm) and automated (SigmaQRSa) and for T waves for manual (SigmaTm) and automated (SigmaTa) measured in the 12-leads of the ECGs was calculated in 28 patients with peripheral edema and 28 controls, without change in their weight during hospitalization; data points (n = 125) from all phases of the study were lamped together. SigmaQRSm was 114.1 +/- 46.2, and SigmaQRSa was 125.4 +/- 49.5 (n = 125); correlation of SigmaQRSm and SigmaQRSa was excellent (r = 0.98, P = .00005). SigmaTm was 18.1 +/- 13.3, and SigmaTa was 19.8 +/- 12.7 (n = 125); correlation of SigmaTm and SigmaTa was excellent (r = 0.96, P = .00005). Correlations of SigmaQRSm and SigmaTm (r = 0.43, P = .0002), as well as SigmaQRSa and SigmaTa (r = 0.49, P = .00005) were fair to moderately good, correspondingly. Manual and automated measurements of the sums of the amplitudes of the QRS complexes and T waves are well correlated and differ by approximately 9%, with the manual measurements generating lower values. Automated measurements of the QRS complexes and T waves are reliable and can be used in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients showing changes in the amplitude of these 2 components of the ECG curve.

摘要

先前大多数关于外周水肿对心电图影响的研究工作都是基于手动测量。此前曾对手动测量和基于自动化测量的P波进行过比较。本研究的目的是比较QRS波群和T波的手动测量与自动测量结果。计算了28例外周水肿患者和28例对照组患者心电图12导联中手动测量(SigmaQRSm)和自动测量(SigmaQRSa)的QRS波群振幅总和,以及手动测量(SigmaTm)和自动测量(SigmaTa)的T波振幅总和,这些患者在住院期间体重未发生变化;将研究各阶段的数据点(n = 125)合并在一起。SigmaQRSm为114.1±46.2,SigmaQRSa为125.4±49.5(n = 125);SigmaQRSm与SigmaQRSa的相关性极佳(r = 0.98,P = 0.00005)。SigmaTm为18.1±13.3,SigmaTa为19.8±12.7(n = 125);SigmaTm与SigmaTa的相关性极佳(r = 0.96,P = 0.00005)。SigmaQRSm与SigmaTm的相关性(r = 0.43,P = 0.0002)以及SigmaQRSa与SigmaTa的相关性(r = 0.49,P = 0.00005)相应地为中等至良好。QRS波群和T波振幅总和的手动测量与自动测量相关性良好,相差约9%,手动测量值较低。QRS波群和T波的自动测量可靠,可用于诊断和监测心电图曲线这两个组成部分振幅出现变化的患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验