撤回:脱氢表雄酮(DHEA)补充剂对认知功能的影响。

WITHDRAWN: Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation for cognitive function.

作者信息

Huppert F A, Van Niekerk J K

机构信息

University of Cambridge, Department of Psychiatry, Box 189 Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK, CB2 2QO.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2006(2):CD000304. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000304.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In view of the theoretical rationale for beneficial effects of DHEA and DHEAS on cognitive function in ageing and dementia, we have undertaken a thorough investigation of well-conducted studies in this area. This will provide a basis for confirmation of any effect of DHEA/S administration in humans in properly controlled trials. The review will also provide a scientific basis for effective dosage, acceptable route and duration of administration, and side effect profiles. This review is especially pertinent at this time as DHEA is currently being sold in large quantities in health food stores, particularly in the USA. In some cases the recommended dose is different for men and women (50mg/day for men and 25mg/day for women) and the basis for this recommendation needs to be explored.

OBJECTIVES

To establish whether administration of DHEA, or its sulphate, DHEAS, improves cognitive function or reduces the rate of decline of cognitive function in normal older adults or in individuals with dementia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant electronic databases, journals, personal communications and conference abstracts were searched for randomised controlled trials investigating the effects of DHEA/S on cognition in older adults.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All relevant randomised controlled trials of DHEA/S were considered for inclusion in the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data for the specified outcomes were independently extracted by two reviewers (FAH & JvN) and cross-checked. Any discrepancies were discussed and resolved. No data pooling was undertaken owing to the lack of availability of the relevant statistics.

MAIN RESULTS

There are four included studies, three cognition in normal older people, and Barnhart 1999 in perimenopausal women with decreased well-being. There were no studies in dementia. There were a few significant findings. Wolf 1997 found significant improvement following DHEA compared with placebo in both immediate recall (MD 0.8, 95% CI 0.16, 1.44) and delayed recall (MD 0.9, 95% CI 0.09, 1.71) of a visual memory test in women, estimated in a crossover trial after 2 weeks of treatment with each of DHEA and placebo. However there was no significant improvement in men, nor a significant effect on a verbal memory test. There was also no significant effect on four other cognitive tests. Wolf 1998 (2) found that placebo group performance deteriorated significantly on a test of selective attention following a psychosocial stressor (p<0.05), while deterioration was not evident in the DHEA group (p=0.85) after two weeks of treatment. However, when compared to placebo, DHEA produced a significant impairment on a visual memory test (p<0.01) following the stressor. No significant effect was found on a third cognitive task. Effects were not found on tasks when administered in the absence of a stressor. Barnhart 1999 employed three cognitive measures and found no significant effect of DHEA compared with placebo at 3 months. Findings to date suggest that DHEA replacement seems to be well tolerated with an absence of significant side-effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The data offer no support at present for an improvement in memory or other aspects of cognitive function following DHEA treatment in normal older people. In view of the growing public enthusiasm for DHEA supplementation, particularly in the USA, and the possibility that any neuroprotective effect of DHEA/S may only be evident in the long term, there is a need to undertake high quality trials in which the duration of DHEA treatment is longer than one year, and the number of participants is large enough to detect effects if they exist.Recently, trials of DHEA supplementation in Alzheimer's Disease (USA), post-menopausal women (USA), normal older men (UK), and a one-year trial in normal older men and women (France) have been completed. As soon as the results are available these studies will be included in the review.

摘要

背景

鉴于脱氢表雄酮(DHEA)和硫酸脱氢表雄酮(DHEAS)对衰老和痴呆认知功能有益作用的理论依据,我们对该领域开展良好的研究进行了全面调查。这将为在适当对照试验中证实DHEA/S对人类的任何作用提供依据。该综述还将为有效剂量、可接受的给药途径和给药持续时间以及副作用概况提供科学依据。鉴于目前DHEA在保健食品商店大量销售,尤其是在美国,此时进行该综述尤为相关。在某些情况下,男性和女性的推荐剂量不同(男性50mg/天,女性25mg/天),需要探究这一推荐的依据。

目的

确定给予DHEA或其硫酸盐DHEAS是否能改善正常老年人或痴呆患者的认知功能或降低认知功能下降速率。

检索策略

检索相关电子数据库、期刊、个人通信和会议摘要,以查找调查DHEA/S对老年人认知影响的随机对照试验。

入选标准

所有相关的DHEA/S随机对照试验均被考虑纳入该综述。

数据收集与分析

两名审阅者(FAH和JvN)独立提取指定结局的数据并进行交叉核对。任何差异都进行了讨论并解决。由于缺乏相关统计数据,未进行数据合并。

主要结果

纳入了四项研究,三项针对正常老年人的认知研究,以及Barnhart 1999年针对幸福感下降的围绝经期女性的研究。没有针对痴呆患者的研究。有一些显著发现。Wolf 1997发现,在一项视觉记忆测试中,与安慰剂相比,DHEA治疗后女性的即时回忆(MD 0.8,95%CI 0.16,1.44)和延迟回忆(MD 0.9,95%CI 0.09,1.71)均有显著改善,这是在交叉试验中,分别用DHEA和安慰剂治疗2周后评估得出的。然而,男性没有显著改善,对言语记忆测试也没有显著影响。对其他四项认知测试也没有显著影响。Wolf 1998(2)发现,在心理社会应激源作用后的一项选择性注意力测试中,安慰剂组的表现显著恶化(p<0.05),而在DHEA组中,治疗两周后恶化不明显(p = 0.85)。然而,与安慰剂相比,应激源作用后DHEA对视觉记忆测试产生了显著损害(p<0.01)。在第三个认知任务上未发现显著影响。在没有应激源的情况下给药时,对任务没有影响。Barnhart 1999采用了三项认知测量方法,发现与安慰剂相比,3个月时DHEA没有显著影响。迄今为止的研究结果表明,DHEA替代疗法似乎耐受性良好,没有明显的副作用。

作者结论

目前的数据不支持DHEA治疗能改善正常老年人的记忆或其他认知功能方面。鉴于公众对补充DHEA的热情日益高涨,尤其是在美国,以及DHEA/S的任何神经保护作用可能仅在长期才明显,有必要进行高质量试验,其中DHEA治疗的持续时间超过一年,且参与者数量足够多,以便在存在影响时能够检测到。最近,在美国进行的阿尔茨海默病DHEA补充试验、绝经后女性DHEA补充试验、英国正常老年男性DHEA补充试验以及法国正常老年男性和女性的一年期试验均已完成。一旦有结果,这些研究将纳入该综述。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索