• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

撤回:针对慢性认知障碍患者谵妄的多学科团队干预措施。

WITHDRAWN: Multidisciplinary team interventions for delirium in patients with chronic cognitive impairment.

作者信息

Britton A, Russell R

机构信息

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Geriatric Unit, Level 7, King George Vth Building, Missenden Rd, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2050.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2006(2):CD000395. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000395.pub3.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD000395.pub3
PMID:17636635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10798417/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delirium is common in hospitalized elderly people. Delirium may affect 60% of frail elderly people in hospital. Among the cognitively impaired, 45% have been found to develop delirium and these patients have longer lengths of hospital stay and a higher rate of complications which, with other factors, increase costs of care. The management of delirium has commonly been multifaceted, the primary emphasis has to be on the diagnosis and therapy of precipitating factors, but as these may not be immediately resolved, symptomatic and supportive care are also of major importance.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to assess the available evidence for the effectiveness, if any, of multidisciplinary team interventions in the coordinated care of elderly patients with delirium superimposed on an underlying chronic cognitive impairment in comparison with usual care.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The trials were identified from a last updated search of the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group on 3 July 2003 using the terms delirium and confus* . The Register is regularly updated and contains records of all major health care databases and many ongoing trial databases.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Selection for possible inclusion in this review was made on the basis of the research methodology - controlled trials whose participants are reported as having chronic cognitive impairment, and who then developed incident delirium and were randomly assigned to either coordinated multidisciplinary care or usual care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Nine controlled trials were identified for possible inclusion in the review, only one of which met the inclusion criteria. At present the data from that study cannot be analysed. We have requested additional data from the authors and are awaiting their reply.

MAIN RESULTS

No studies focused on patients with prior cognitive impairment, so management of delirium in this group could not be assessed. There is very little information on the management of delirium in the literature despite an increasing body of information about the incidence, risks and prognosis of the disorder in the elderly population.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The management of delirium needs to be studied in a more clearly defined way before evidence-based guidelines can be developed. Insufficient data are available for the development of evidence-based guidelines on diagnosis or management. There is scope for research in all areas - from basic pathophysiology and epidemiology to prevention and management. Though much recent research has focused on the problem of delirium, the evidence is still difficult to utilize in management programmes. Research needs to be undertaken targeting specific groups known to be at high risk of developing delirium, for example the cognitively impaired and the frail elderly. As has been highlighted by Inouye 1999, delirium has very important economic and health policy implications and is a clinical problem that can affect all aspects of care of an ill older person.Delirium, though a frequent problem in hospitalized elderly patients, is still managed empirically and there is no evidence in the literature to support change to current practice at this time.

摘要

背景

谵妄在住院老年人中很常见。谵妄可能影响60%的住院体弱老年人。在认知障碍患者中,45%被发现会发生谵妄,这些患者住院时间更长,并发症发生率更高,与其他因素一起增加了护理成本。谵妄的管理通常是多方面的,主要重点必须放在诱发因素的诊断和治疗上,但由于这些因素可能无法立即解决,对症和支持性护理也非常重要。

目的

本综述的目的是评估多学科团队干预措施与常规护理相比,在协调护理伴有潜在慢性认知障碍的老年谵妄患者方面有效性的现有证据(若有)。

检索策略

通过2003年7月3日对Cochrane痴呆与认知改善小组专业注册库的最新检索,使用术语“谵妄”和“confus*”来识别试验。该注册库定期更新,包含所有主要医疗保健数据库和许多正在进行的试验数据库的记录。

选择标准

根据研究方法选择可能纳入本综述的研究——参与者被报告患有慢性认知障碍,随后发生急性谵妄,并被随机分配到多学科协调护理或常规护理的对照试验。

数据收集与分析

确定了9项对照试验可能纳入本综述,其中只有1项符合纳入标准。目前该研究的数据无法进行分析。我们已要求作者提供更多数据,正在等待他们的回复。

主要结果

没有研究关注有既往认知障碍的患者,因此无法评估该组谵妄的管理情况。尽管关于老年人谵妄的发病率、风险和预后的信息越来越多,但文献中关于谵妄管理的信息却非常少。

作者结论

在制定循证指南之前,需要以更明确的方式研究谵妄的管理。目前尚无足够数据来制定关于诊断或管理的循证指南。从基础病理生理学到流行病学再到预防和管理,所有领域都有研究空间。尽管最近很多研究都聚焦于谵妄问题,但证据在管理方案中仍难以应用。需要针对已知有发生谵妄高风险的特定群体开展研究,例如认知障碍者和体弱老年人。正如Inouye在1999年所强调的,谵妄具有非常重要的经济和卫生政策意义,是一个会影响患病老年人护理各个方面的临床问题。谵妄虽然是住院老年患者的常见问题,但目前仍基于经验进行管理,且文献中没有证据支持改变当前的做法。

相似文献

1
WITHDRAWN: Multidisciplinary team interventions for delirium in patients with chronic cognitive impairment.撤回:针对慢性认知障碍患者谵妄的多学科团队干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2006(2):CD000395. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000395.pub3.
2
Multidisciplinary team interventions for delirium in patients with chronic cognitive impairment.针对慢性认知障碍患者谵妄的多学科团队干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD000395. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000395.pub2.
3
Multidisciplinary team interventions for delirium in patients with chronic cognitive impairment.针对慢性认知障碍患者谵妄的多学科团队干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(1):CD000395. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000395.
4
Multidisciplinary team interventions for delirium in patients with chronic cognitive impairment.针对慢性认知障碍患者谵妄的多学科团队干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000395. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000395.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people undergoing non-cardiac surgery.非心脏手术老年患者术后认知结局:静脉麻醉维持与吸入麻醉维持的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 21;8(8):CD012317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012317.pub2.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients.非 ICU 住院患者预防谵妄的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 26;11(11):CD013307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013307.pub3.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
10
Reminiscence therapy for dementia.痴呆症的回忆疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 1;3(3):CD001120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001120.pub3.