Suppr超能文献

针对慢性认知障碍患者谵妄的多学科团队干预措施。

Multidisciplinary team interventions for delirium in patients with chronic cognitive impairment.

作者信息

Britton A, Russell R

机构信息

Clinical Training Unit, The Royal Prince Albert Hospital, Missenden Rd, Camperdown 2050, Sydney, NSW, AUSTRALIA.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(1):CD000395. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000395.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delirium is common in hospitalized elderly people. In the frail elderly, delirium may occur in 60% of those hospitalized. In the cognitively impaired, 45% have been shown to develop delirium and these patients have longer lengths of hospital stay and a higher rate of complications which, with other factors, together contribute to an increase in cost of care. The combination of being elderly and chronically cognitively impaired leads to a high risk of delirium with the associated increased risk of prolonged hospital stay, complications, and poor outcomes. The management of delirium has commonly been multifaceted - the primary emphasis has always been on the diagnosis and therapy of the precipitating factors, but as these may not be immediately resolved, symptomatic and supportive care may become of major importance.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to assess the available evidence for the effectiveness, if any, of multidisciplinary team interventions in the coordinated care of patients with delirium superimposed on an underlying chronic cognitive impairment compared with the usual care of older cognitively impaired patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search of all available databases and sources of references was carried out in July 2000; this comprised the CDCIG specialised register in addition to the Reviewer's files and bibliographic sources.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Selection for possible inclusion in this review is made on the basis of the research methodology - controlled trials whose participants are reported as having chronic cognitive impairment, and who then developed incident delirium and were randomly assigned to either coordinated multidisciplinary care or usual care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Nine (9) controlled trials were identified for possible inclusion in the review, none of which meets the inclusion criteria, for reasons which are recorded in the table of excluded studies, and no data, therefore, were extracted for cross study analysis or synthesis.

MAIN RESULTS

No studies focused on patients with prior cognitive impairment, so management of delirium in this group could not be assessed. There is very little information on the management of delirium in the literature but there is an increasing body of information about the incidence, risks and prognosis of the disorder in the elderly population.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The management of delirium needs to be studied in a more clearly defined way before evidence-based guidelines can be developed. Insufficient data are available for the development of evidence based guidelines on diagnosis or management. There is scope for research in all areas - from basic pathophysiology and epidemiology to prevention and management. Though much recent research has focused on the problem of delirium, the evidence is still difficult to utilize in management programmes. Research needs to be undertaken targeting specific groups known to be at high risk of developing delirium, for example the cognitively impaired and the frail elderly. As has been highlighted by Inouye 1999, delirium has very important economic and health policy implications and is a clinical problem which affects all aspects of care of the elderly. Delirium, though a frequent problem in the hospitalised elderly patient, is still managed empirically and there is no evidence in the literature to support change to current practice at this time.

摘要

背景

谵妄在住院老年人中很常见。在体弱的老年人中,住院患者发生谵妄的比例可能为60%。在认知障碍患者中,45%的人已被证明会发生谵妄,这些患者住院时间更长,并发症发生率更高,这些因素与其他因素一起导致护理成本增加。老年人和慢性认知障碍并存会导致发生谵妄的高风险,同时还会增加住院时间延长、并发症及不良结局的风险。谵妄的管理通常是多方面的——主要重点一直是对诱发因素的诊断和治疗,但由于这些因素可能无法立即解决,对症和支持性护理可能变得至关重要。

目的

本综述的目的是评估多学科团队干预措施在谵妄叠加基础慢性认知障碍患者的协调护理中与老年认知障碍患者常规护理相比的有效性(如有)的现有证据。

检索策略

2000年7月对所有可用数据库和参考文献来源进行了检索;这包括疾病控制和干预全球信息库(CDCIG)专门登记册以及综述作者的文件和文献来源。

入选标准

根据研究方法选择可能纳入本综述的研究——参与者被报告患有慢性认知障碍、随后发生新发谵妄并被随机分配至多学科协调护理或常规护理的对照试验。

数据收集与分析

确定了9项对照试验可能纳入本综述,但由于排除研究表中记录的原因,这些试验均不符合纳入标准,因此未提取数据进行跨研究分析或综合。

主要结果

没有研究关注既往有认知障碍的患者,因此无法评估该组谵妄的管理情况。文献中关于谵妄管理的信息非常少,但关于该疾病在老年人群中的发病率、风险和预后的信息越来越多。

综述作者结论

在制定循证指南之前,需要以更明确的方式研究谵妄的管理。现有数据不足以制定关于诊断或管理的循证指南。所有领域都有研究空间——从基础病理生理学到流行病学再到预防和管理。尽管最近许多研究都聚焦于谵妄问题,但证据仍难以应用于管理方案。需要针对已知有发生谵妄高风险的特定群体开展研究,例如认知障碍者和体弱老年人。正如Inouye在1999年所强调的,谵妄具有非常重要的经济和卫生政策影响,是一个影响老年人护理各个方面的临床问题。谵妄虽然是住院老年患者中的常见问题,但目前仍采用经验性管理,文献中没有证据支持此时改变当前的做法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验