Suppr超能文献

超级基金:评估行政命令12898的影响。

Superfund: evaluating the impact of executive order 12898.

作者信息

O'Neil Sandra George

机构信息

Curry College, Milton, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Jul;115(7):1087-93. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9903.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) addresses uncontrolled and abandoned hazardous waste sites throughout the country. Sites that are perceived to be a significant threat to both surrounding populations and the environment can be placed on the U.S. EPA Superfund list and qualify for federal cleanup funds. The equitability of the Superfund program has been questioned; the representation of minority and low-income populations in this cleanup program is lower than would be expected. Thus, minorities and low-income populations may not be benefiting proportionately from this environmental cleanup program. In 1994 President Clinton signed Executive Order 12898 requiring that the U.S. EPA and other federal agencies implement environmental justice policies. These policies were to specifically address the disproportionate environmental effects of federal programs and policies on minority and low-income populations.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

I use event history analysis to evaluate the impact of Executive Order 12898 on the equitability of the Superfund program.

DISCUSSION

Findings suggest that despite environmental justice legislation, Superfund site listings in minority and poor areas are even less likely for sites discovered since the 1994 Executive Order.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that Executive Order 12898 for environmental justice has not increased the equitability of the Superfund program.

摘要

背景

美国环境保护局(EPA)负责处理全国范围内未受控制和废弃的危险废物场地。那些被认为对周边居民和环境构成重大威胁的场地可被列入美国EPA超级基金名单,并获得联邦清理资金。超级基金项目的公平性受到了质疑;少数族裔和低收入人群在这一清理项目中的代表性低于预期。因此,少数族裔和低收入人群可能并未从这一环境清理项目中按比例受益。1994年,克林顿总统签署了第12898号行政命令,要求美国EPA和其他联邦机构实施环境正义政策。这些政策旨在具体解决联邦项目和政策对少数族裔和低收入人群不成比例的环境影响。

目的和方法

我使用事件历史分析来评估第12898号行政命令对超级基金项目公平性的影响。

讨论

研究结果表明,尽管有环境正义立法,但自1994年行政命令发布以来发现的场地,在少数族裔和贫困地区被列入超级基金名单的可能性更低。

结论

本研究结果表明,关于环境正义的第12898号行政命令并未提高超级基金项目的公平性。

相似文献

1
Superfund: evaluating the impact of executive order 12898.
Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Jul;115(7):1087-93. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9903.
2
Evaluating public participation in environmental decision-making: EPA's superfund community involvement program.
J Environ Manage. 2005 Nov;77(3):165-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.002. Epub 2005 Aug 22.
3
The Environmental Protection Agency's Use of Community Involvement to Engage Communities at Superfund Sites.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 29;16(21):4166. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214166.
4
Environmental justice in Indian country: dumpsite remediation on the Swinomish Indian reservation.
Environ Manage. 2006 Dec;38(6):896-909. doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-0103-0. Epub 2006 Oct 20.
5
Nature, extent, and impact of Superfund hazardous waste sites.
Chemosphere. 1995 Jul;31(1):2415-28. doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(95)00112-l.
6
Making cleanup decisions at hazardous waste sites: the clean sites approach.
J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 1991 Sep;41(9):1172-5. doi: 10.1080/10473289.1991.10466911.
7
Collaboration and importance of federally sponsored Superfund research programs.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2002 Mar;205(1-2):1-9. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00124.
8
The sedimented social histories of environmental cleanups: An ethnography of social and institutional dynamics.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jan 15;278(Pt 2):111530. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111530. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
9
Overview of proposed revisions to the superfund hazard ranking system.
JAPCA. 1989 Jun;39(6):801-7. doi: 10.1080/08940630.1989.10466564.
10
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

2
Demographic inequities and cumulative environmental burdens within communities near superfund sites on Long Island, New York.
Health Place. 2025 Jan;91:103409. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103409. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
4
Increased Dementia Mortality in West Virginia Counties with Mountaintop Removal Mining?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 4;16(21):4278. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214278.
5
Community, state, and federal approaches to cumulative risk assessment: challenges and opportunities for integration.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Apr 24;12(5):4546-71. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120504546.
6
7
The politics of smoking in federal buildings: an executive order case study.
Am J Public Health. 2009 Sep;99(9):1588-95. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.151829. Epub 2009 Jul 16.

本文引用的文献

2
Unequal exposure to ecological hazards: environmental injustices in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Apr;110 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):277-88. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s2277.
3
Is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency brownfields assessment pilot program environmentally just?
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Apr;110 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):249-57. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s2249.
4
Solid waste sites and the black Houston community.
Sociol Inq. 1983;53(2-3):273-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682x.1983.tb00037.x.
6
Public perceptions of a radioactively contaminated site: concerns, remediation preferences, and desired involvement.
Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Dec;104(12):1344-52. doi: 10.1289/ehp.961041344.
7
Environmental equity: the demographics of dumping.
Demography. 1994 May;31(2):229-48.
8
Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks.
Risk Anal. 1994 Dec;14(6):1101-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00082.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验