Suppr超能文献

评估环境不平等:我们得出的结论如何因所采用的定义而异。

ASSESSING ENVIRONMENTAL INEQUALITY: HOW THE CONCLUSIONS WE DRAW VARY ACCORDING TO THE DEFINITIONS WE EMPLOY.

作者信息

Downey Liam

机构信息

Sociology Department, University of Colorado.

出版信息

Sociol Spectr. 2005;25(3):349-369. doi: 10.1080/027321790518870.

Abstract

This article demonstrates that the conclusions environmental inequality researchers draw vary according to the definitions of environmental inequality they employ and that researchers can use a single set of results to test for the existence of multiple forms of environmental inequality. In order to illustrate these points, I set forth five definitions of environmental inequality, list the kinds of evidence we must obtain in order to determine whether each form of environmental inequality exists, and show how conclusions drawn from several recent environmental inequality studies vary depending on the definition of environmental inequality we employ. My goal is not to show that any one definition is superior to the others; nor am I trying to generalize from the studies reported here to a broader set of research findings. Instead, my goal is to a) show that we can use a single set of results to address a variety of environmental justice concerns and b) demonstrate that our interpretations of environmental inequality research have been too narrowly focused on one set of environmental inequality outcomes.

摘要

本文表明,环境不平等研究人员得出的结论会因他们所采用的环境不平等定义的不同而有所差异,并且研究人员可以使用同一组结果来检验多种形式的环境不平等是否存在。为了阐明这些观点,我提出了环境不平等的五种定义,列出了为确定每种形式的环境不平等是否存在我们必须获取的证据类型,并展示了从最近几项环境不平等研究中得出的结论如何因我们所采用的环境不平等定义的不同而有所不同。我的目的不是表明任何一种定义比其他定义更优越;我也不是试图从这里报告的研究推广到更广泛的研究结果。相反,我的目的是:a)表明我们可以使用同一组结果来解决各种环境正义问题;b)证明我们对环境不平等研究的解释过于狭隘地集中在一组环境不平等结果上。

相似文献

2
ENVIRONMENTAL INEQUALITY IN METROPOLITAN AMERICA IN 2000.
Sociol Spectr. 2006;26(1):21-41. doi: 10.1080/02732170500256716.
3
US Metropolitan-area Variation in Environmental Inequality Outcomes.
Urban Stud. 2007 May;44(5-6):953-977. doi: 10.1080/00420980701256013.
5
Incorporating concepts of inequality and inequity into health benefits analysis.
Int J Equity Health. 2006 Mar 28;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-5-2.
6
Environmental Inequality in Metropolitan America.
Organ Environ. 2008 Sep 1;21(3):270-294. doi: 10.1177/1086026608321327.
9
Childhood Development and Access to Nature: A New Direction for Environmental Inequality Research.
Organ Environ. 2009 Mar;22(1):99-122. doi: 10.1177/1086026609333340.
10
Using inequality measures to incorporate environmental justice into regulatory analyses.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Aug 30;10(9):4039-59. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10094039.

引用本文的文献

1
Leave no one behind: A case of ecosystem service supply equity in Singapore.
Ambio. 2022 Oct;51(10):2118-2136. doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01735-x. Epub 2022 May 4.
3
A Novel Environmental Justice Indicator for Managing Local Air Pollution.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 14;15(6):1260. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061260.
4
ENVIRONMENTAL INEQUALITY IN METROPOLITAN AMERICA IN 2000.
Sociol Spectr. 2006;26(1):21-41. doi: 10.1080/02732170500256716.
5
Childhood Development and Access to Nature: A New Direction for Environmental Inequality Research.
Organ Environ. 2009 Mar;22(1):99-122. doi: 10.1177/1086026609333340.
6
RACE, INCOME, AND ENVIRONMENTAL INEQUALITY IN THE UNITED STATES.
Sociol Perspect. 2008 Dec 1;51(4):759-781. doi: 10.1525/sop.2008.51.4.759.
7
Superfund: evaluating the impact of executive order 12898.
Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Jul;115(7):1087-93. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9903.

本文引用的文献

1
The Unintended Significance of Race: Environmental Racial Inequality in Detroit.
Soc Forces. 2005 Mar;83(3):971-1007. doi: 10.1353/sof.2005.0026.
2
Environmental stressors: the mental health impacts of living near industrial activity.
J Health Soc Behav. 2005 Sep;46(3):289-305. doi: 10.1177/002214650504600306.
3
An analytical review of environmental justice research: what do we really know?
Environ Manage. 2002 Jan;29(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s00267-001-0037-8.
4
Environmental equity: the demographics of dumping.
Demography. 1994 May;31(2):229-48.
5
Medical care and mortality: racial differences in preventable deaths.
Int J Health Serv. 1985;15(1):1-22. doi: 10.2190/90P3-LEFF-WNU0-GLY6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验