Chung Shan-Shan, Leung Monica Miu-Yin
Croucher Institute for Environmental Sciences, Department of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
Environ Manage. 2007 Oct;40(4):603-12. doi: 10.1007/s00267-006-0363-y. Epub 2007 Jul 18.
The discrepancy between verbal and actual commitment in waste recycling and environmental behavior is thought to have attenuated the effectiveness of many environmental policy and measures. Studies purport to show the existence of such a value-action gap in environmental issues has been largely based on matching the verbal commitment to environmental value through self-reported environmental behavioral data. Therefore, there is a lack of direct evidence to prove that such a discrepancy exists. This study demonstrates a methodology (contrasting on-site observation with self-reported results) to measure the gap between verbal commitment and actual recycling behavior and provides an explanation on the recycling behavior of students at Hong Kong Baptist University in the hope that the lessons learnt can be generalized to a wider context. Our findings indicate that a gap between verbal recycling commitment and corresponding action does exist in waste recycling on this university campus. By using multiple linear regression analysis, we found that the self-reported recycling behavior of undergraduates cannot be meaningfully explained by most variables previously suggested in the general value-action model.
在废物回收利用和环境行为方面,言语承诺与实际行动之间的差异被认为削弱了许多环境政策和措施的有效性。旨在表明在环境问题中存在这种价值观 - 行动差距的研究,很大程度上是基于通过自我报告的环境行为数据来匹配对环境价值观的言语承诺。因此,缺乏直接证据来证明这种差异的存在。本研究展示了一种方法(将现场观察与自我报告结果进行对比)来衡量言语承诺与实际回收行为之间的差距,并对香港浸会大学学生的回收行为进行了解释,希望所学经验能推广到更广泛的背景中。我们的研究结果表明,在该大学校园的废物回收中,言语上的回收承诺与相应行动之间确实存在差距。通过多元线性回归分析,我们发现大学生自我报告的回收行为无法由一般价值观 - 行动模型中先前提出的大多数变量进行有意义的解释。