Suppr超能文献

奶牛站立或行走时对软质或硬质地面的偏好。

Dairy cow preferences for soft or hard flooring when standing or walking.

作者信息

Telezhenko E, Lidfors L, Bergsten C

机构信息

Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Skara, Sweden.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2007 Aug;90(8):3716-24. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-876.

Abstract

Concrete is the most commonly used alley flooring in confined dairy herds because of its qualities of construction and ease of cleaning. Nevertheless, the hardness, abrasiveness, and slipperiness of concrete floors have adverse effects on animal well-being and health, and yielding rubber flooring is becoming popular as a way of improving the flooring conditions on walkways. The aim of this study was to investigate preferences of dairy cows for rubber compared with concrete flooring under the conditions of a commercial dairy farm. The study was conducted in an organic dairy herd with free-stall housing. Floor preference was tested on groups of standing cows in a 120-m2 holding pen before milking, and 1 yr later on a 12- x 3-m walkway. The holding pen and the walkway were divided lengthwise into 2 identical sections. Two types of solid rubber mats (soft and extra soft) were tested against solid concrete in the holding pen. Slatted and solid rubber mats were tested against slatted concrete in the walkway. Each floor type was tested over 4 d on the left side and 4 d on the right side of the holding pen and the walkway, respectively. Concrete flooring on both sides of the sections was tested as a control before the testing of different section materials. All observations of the distribution of cows in the sections were made from video recordings captured in association with the afternoon milking. The number of cows on each section was recorded approximately every 7 min in the holding pen, and continuously on the walkway. A significantly higher proportion of cows stood on the side with the soft and extra soft rubber mats (65.1 +/- 2.7 and 69.3 +/- 2.6%, respectively, mean +/- SEM) compared with the control distribution when only the solid concrete was available (50.9 +/- 3.9%). A significantly higher proportion of nonlame cows walked exclusively on the side with the slatted (64.5 +/- 5.4%, d 4) or solid rubber mats (68.2 +/- 5.1%, d 4) compared with controls (28.9 +/- 4.3%). Lame cows within a group of walking cows did not show a higher preference for soft flooring as distinct as nonlame cows (52.7 +/- 6.9 and 59.4 +/- 6.2% for the solid and slatted rubber mats, respectively, at d 4 vs. 40.3 +/- 6.2% for control), presumably because of competition with other, higher ranked cows. It was concluded that the majority of cows preferred to walk and stand on soft rubber rather than on concrete flooring.

摘要

由于混凝土的施工特性和易于清洁,它是封闭式奶牛场中最常用的通道地面材料。然而,混凝土地面的硬度、耐磨性和滑溜性对动物的健康和福祉有不利影响,而柔软的橡胶地板作为改善通道地面条件的一种方式正变得越来越流行。本研究的目的是在商业奶牛场的条件下,调查奶牛对橡胶地板和混凝土地板的偏好。该研究在一个采用自由牛栏饲养的有机奶牛群中进行。在挤奶前,在一个120平方米的待挤区对站立的奶牛群进行地面偏好测试,1年后在一条12×3米的通道上进行测试。待挤区和通道沿长度方向被分成两个相同的部分。在待挤区,将两种类型的实心橡胶垫(软质和超软质)与实心混凝土进行对比测试。在通道上,将板条橡胶垫和实心橡胶垫与板条混凝土进行对比测试。每种地面类型在待挤区和通道的左侧各测试4天,右侧各测试4天。在测试不同部分的材料之前,先对各部分两侧的混凝土地面进行测试作为对照。所有关于奶牛在各部分分布情况的观察都是通过与下午挤奶相关的视频记录进行的。在待挤区,大约每7分钟记录一次各部分的奶牛数量,在通道上则持续记录。与只有实心混凝土时的对照分布(50.9±3.9%)相比,站在软质和超软质橡胶垫一侧的奶牛比例显著更高(分别为65.1±2.7%和69.3±2.6%,均值±标准误)。与对照组(28.9±4.3%)相比,非跛行奶牛中,显著更高比例的奶牛只在板条橡胶垫一侧行走(第4天为64.5±5.4%)或只在实心橡胶垫一侧行走(第4天为68.2±5.1%)。在一群行走的奶牛中,跛行奶牛对软质地面的偏好并不像非跛行奶牛那样明显(第4天,实心橡胶垫和板条橡胶垫分别为52.7±6.9%和59.4±6.2%,而对照组为40.3±6.2%),这可能是因为它们要与其他地位更高的奶牛竞争。研究得出结论,大多数奶牛更喜欢在软质橡胶地面上行走和站立,而不是在混凝土地面上。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验