Ertresvg Janne Marit, Stovner Lars Jacob, Kvavik Lene Ekern, Johnsen Hans-Jorgen, Zwart John-Anker, Helde Grethe, Bovim Gunnar
Norwegian National Headache Centre, Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
BMC Med. 2007 Jul 17;5:19. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-5-19.
Migraine aura may be difficult to differentiate from transient ischemic attacks and other transient neurological disorders in pregnant women. The aims of the present study were to investigate and diagnose all pregnant women with transient neurological disorders of suspected central nervous system origin, and to compare this group with a control group of pregnant women with regard to vascular risk factors and prognosis.
During a 28 month period, 41 patients were detected with transient neurological symptoms during pregnancy. These were studied in detail with thorough clinical and laboratory investigations in order to make a certain diagnosis and to evaluate whether the episodes might be of a vascular nature. For comparison, the same investigations were performed in 41 pregnant controls. To assess the prognosis, both patients and controls were followed with questionnaires every year for five years.
Migraine with aura was the most common cause of symptoms during pregnancy, occurring in 34 patients, while 2 were diagnosed with stroke, 2 with carpal tunnel syndrome, 1 with partial epilepsy, 1 with multiple sclerosis and 1 with presyncope. Patients had more headache before pregnancy than controls, but the average levels of vascular risk factors were similar. None of the patients or the controls reported cerebrovascular episodes during the five-year follow-up.
The diagnosis of migraine aura was difficult because for many patients it was their first ever attack and headache tended to be absent or of non-migraineous type. The aura features were more complex, with several aura symptoms and a higher prevalence of sensory and dysphasic aura than usual. Gradually developing aura symptoms, or different aura symptoms occurring in succession as described in the International Classification of Headache Disorders, seem to be useful for differentiating aura from other transient disorders. A meticulous history and clinical neurological examination are more useful than routine supplementary investigations for cerebrovascular disease. The five-year follow-up clearly indicates that migraine with aura in pregnancy usually has a good prognosis with regard to cerebrovascular events.
偏头痛性先兆可能难以与孕妇的短暂性脑缺血发作及其他短暂性神经系统疾病相鉴别。本研究的目的是调查并诊断所有疑似中枢神经系统起源的短暂性神经系统疾病的孕妇,并将该组与孕妇对照组在血管危险因素和预后方面进行比较。
在28个月的时间里,41例患者在孕期出现了短暂性神经系统症状。对这些患者进行了详细的临床和实验室检查,以做出明确诊断并评估这些发作是否可能具有血管性本质。为作比较,对41名怀孕对照组进行了同样的检查。为评估预后,对患者和对照组每年进行问卷调查,持续五年。
伴有先兆的偏头痛是孕期症状最常见的原因,34例患者出现此症状,而2例被诊断为中风,2例为腕管综合征,1例为部分性癫痫,1例为多发性硬化,1例为晕厥前状态。患者孕前头痛比对照组更多,但血管危险因素的平均水平相似。在五年随访期间,患者和对照组均未报告脑血管事件。
偏头痛性先兆的诊断困难,因为对许多患者来说这是他们的首次发作,且头痛往往不存在或为非偏头痛类型。先兆特征更为复杂,有多种先兆症状,且感觉性和言语困难性先兆的发生率高于平常。如《头痛疾病国际分类》中所述的逐渐发展的先兆症状或相继出现的不同先兆症状,似乎有助于将先兆与其他短暂性疾病相鉴别。细致的病史和临床神经学检查比脑血管疾病的常规辅助检查更有用。五年随访清楚表明,孕期伴有先兆的偏头痛在脑血管事件方面通常预后良好。