Okiwelu Tamunosa, Hussein Julia, Adjei Sam, Arhinful Daniel, Armar-Klemesu Margaret
Institute of Public Administration, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria.
Health Policy. 2007 Dec;84(2-3):359-67. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.05.012. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
This paper is an exploration of health sector and programming issues that resulted from a description of safe motherhood activities in Ghana.
Descriptions of safe motherhood programmes were collected from various stakeholders through structured interviews. The characteristics of the programmes were compared to national safe motherhood aims and in the context of the reproductive health and sector-wide environment in Ghana.
Thirteen safe motherhood programmes were described. Their goals were wide ranging and did not necessarily target pregnant and postpartum women only. Community based interventions were slightly less dominant than service provision activities. A broad funding base was identified, strongly represented by external donors. Many funding contributions were not part of the Ghana government's Sector-Wide Approach (SWAp) to health.
Although reduction in maternal mortality ratio is a priority in Ghana's policy, many funding agencies supporting what are known as "safe motherhood" programmes are actually pursuing a somewhat broader reproductive health agenda. The evidence that this situation has actually led to a dilution of the maternal mortality reduction agenda is inconclusive, although our analysis has resulted in lessons which could be used to avert any risk to achieving this key millennium development goal. Government can use the SWAp to keep interests focused on the need for maternal mortality reduction, without detriment to other priorities. Strengthening partnerships will allow civil society and community focused interests to have a voice in influencing SWAp agendas. Good programme design with clear understanding of the link between programme components and objectives will help in making sure that maternal mortality targets are indeed achieved.
本文旨在探讨因对加纳安全孕产活动的描述而引发的卫生部门及规划问题。
通过结构化访谈从各利益相关方收集安全孕产项目的描述。将这些项目的特点与国家安全孕产目标以及加纳生殖健康和全部门环境进行比较。
描述了13个安全孕产项目。它们的目标范围广泛,并不一定仅针对孕妇和产后妇女。基于社区的干预措施比服务提供活动的主导性稍弱。确定了广泛的资金来源,外部捐助者的占比很大。许多资金贡献并非加纳政府卫生部门全部门办法(SWAp)的一部分。
尽管降低孕产妇死亡率是加纳政策的优先事项,但许多支持所谓“安全孕产”项目的资助机构实际上在推行一个更为宽泛的生殖健康议程。虽然这种情况实际上导致降低孕产妇死亡率议程被稀释的证据尚无定论,但我们分析得出的经验教训可用于避免对实现这一关键千年发展目标造成任何风险。政府可利用全部门办法使各方关注降低孕产妇死亡率的必要性,同时不损害其他优先事项。加强伙伴关系将使民间社会和关注社区的各方能够在影响全部门办法议程方面发声。清晰理解项目组成部分与目标之间的联系并进行良好的项目设计,将有助于确保确实实现孕产妇死亡率目标。