Papke Karsten, Kuhl Christiane K, Fruth Martin, Haupt Cornel, Schlunz-Hendann Martin, Sauner Dieter, Fiebich Martin, Bani Alan, Brassel Friedhelm
Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Klinikum Duisburg, Zu den Rehwiesen 9, D-47055 Duisburg, Germany.
Radiology. 2007 Aug;244(2):532-40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2442060394.
To evaluate the sensitivity of 16-detector row computed tomographic (CT) angiography in diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms and to determine whether multidetector CT angiography provides sufficient diagnostic information to guide endovascular treatment, with combined imaging and clinical data as the reference standard.
Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Eighty-seven patients clinically suspected of having subarachnoid hemorrhage underwent multidetector CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Aneurysm detection with multidetector CT angiography and DSA was analyzed on a per-patient and a per-aneurysm basis. For each aneurysm deemed ruptured on multidetector CT angiograms, the same multidetector CT angiography data set was used to determine whether the aneurysm was suitable for endovascular coil placement or whether a neurosurgical procedure was preferable. Criteria were based on neck width in relation to aneurysm size and the presence of vessels originating from the aneurysm. Results were compared with actual treatment that had been performed in each aneurysm after full diagnostic work-up, including DSA. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for aneurysm presence were determined.
The reference standard revealed 84 aneurysms in 63 patients. Multidetector CT angiography was used to correctly identify 62 of 63 patients with 80 of 84 aneurysms and to correctly rule out aneurysms in 24 patients. DSA was used to correctly identify 62 of 63 patients with 79 of 84 aneurysms and to correctly rule out aneurysms in 23 patients. Per patient, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, respectively, for presence of aneurysm(s) were 98%, 100%, 100%, and 96% for multidetector CT angiography and 98%, 100%, 98%, and 96% for DSA. Per aneurysm, the possibility of coil embolization was correctly assessed with multidetector CT angiography in 69 (93%) of 74 target aneurysms for acute occlusive treatment.
Multidetector CT angiography offers high diagnostic accuracy-equivalent to that of DSA-in the detection of intracranial aneurysms. Also, the possibility of coil embolization can be reliably determined with multidetector CT angiography.
以联合影像和临床数据作为参考标准,评估16排螺旋CT血管造影术(CTA)诊断颅内动脉瘤的敏感性,并确定多排CT血管造影术是否能提供足够的诊断信息以指导血管内治疗。
获得机构审查委员会批准并取得患者知情同意。87例临床怀疑蛛网膜下腔出血的患者接受了多排CT血管造影术和数字减影血管造影术(DSA)。在患者层面和动脉瘤层面分析多排CT血管造影术和DSA检测动脉瘤的情况。对于在多排CT血管造影图上被判定为破裂的每个动脉瘤,使用相同的多排CT血管造影数据集来确定该动脉瘤是否适合血管内弹簧圈栓塞,或者是否更适合神经外科手术。标准基于瘤颈宽度与动脉瘤大小的关系以及起源于动脉瘤的血管的存在情况。将结果与每个动脉瘤在包括DSA在内的全面诊断检查后实际进行的治疗进行比较。确定动脉瘤存在的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。
参考标准显示63例患者中有84个动脉瘤。多排CT血管造影术正确识别出63例患者中的62例以及84个动脉瘤中的80个,并正确排除了24例患者的动脉瘤。DSA正确识别出63例患者中的62例以及84个动脉瘤中的79个,并正确排除了23例患者的动脉瘤。在患者层面,多排CT血管造影术检测动脉瘤存在的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为98%、100%、100%和96%,DSA分别为98%、100%、98%和96%。在动脉瘤层面,对于74个用于急性闭塞治疗的目标动脉瘤,多排CT血管造影术正确评估了其中69个(93%)进行弹簧圈栓塞的可能性。
多排CT血管造影术在检测颅内动脉瘤方面具有与DSA相当的高诊断准确性。此外,多排CT血管造影术能够可靠地确定弹簧圈栓塞的可能性。