Suppr超能文献

不同步的互相关量化:一种量化心脏收缩与舒张同步性的新方法。

Cross-correlation quantification of dyssynchrony: a new method for quantifying the synchrony of contraction and relaxation in the heart.

作者信息

Fornwalt Brandon K, Arita Takeshi, Bhasin Mohit, Voulgaris George, Merlino John D, León Angel R, Fyfe Derek A, Oshinski John N

机构信息

Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.

出版信息

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007 Dec;20(12):1330-1337.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.04.030. Epub 2007 Jul 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quantification of left ventricular dyssynchrony using Doppler tissue imaging may improve selection of patients who will benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy. Most methods used to quantify dyssynchrony use a time-to-peak analysis, which is quantitatively simplistic and requires manual identification of systole and selection of peak velocities.

METHODS

We developed and tested a new, highly automatable dyssynchrony parameter, cross-correlation delay (XCD), that does not require identification of systole or manual selection of peak systolic velocities. XCD uses all velocity data points from 3 consecutive beats (approximately 420 points). We tested XCD on 11 members of a positive control group (responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy with a >or=15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume) and 12 members of a negative control group (normal 12-lead electrocardiogram and 2-dimensional echocardiogram findings). We compared XCD to septal-to-lateral delay in time-to-peak (SLD), maximum difference in the basal 2- or 4-chamber times to peak (MaxDiff), and SD of the 12 basal and midwall times-to-peak (Ts-SD).

RESULTS

XCD and Ts-SD were significantly different between the positive and negative control groups (both P <or= .0001). SLD and MaxDiff demonstrated no difference between the positive and negative control groups. XCD and Ts-SD were superior to SLD and MaxDiff in discriminating between positive and negative control groups (both P < .01 by receiver operating characteristic comparison). XCD, SLD, MaxDiff, and Ts-SD demonstrated dyssynchrony in 0%, 50%, 58%, and 50% of the negative control group, respectively. XCD was the only parameter that decreased after resynchronization in the positive control group (from 160 +/- 88-69 +/- 61 milliseconds, P = .003).

CONCLUSION

XCD is superior to existing parameters at discriminating patients with left ventricular dyssynchrony from those with normal function.

摘要

背景

使用多普勒组织成像对左心室不同步进行量化,可能会改善对将从心脏再同步治疗中获益的患者的选择。大多数用于量化不同步的方法采用峰值时间分析,这种方法在定量方面过于简单,并且需要手动识别收缩期并选择峰值速度。

方法

我们开发并测试了一种新的、高度自动化的不同步参数,即互相关延迟(XCD),它不需要识别收缩期或手动选择收缩期峰值速度。XCD使用来自连续3个心动周期的所有速度数据点(约420个点)。我们在11名阳性对照组成员(心脏再同步治疗反应者,左心室收缩末期容积减少≥15%)和12名阴性对照组成员(12导联心电图和二维超声心动图结果正常)中测试了XCD。我们将XCD与间隔至侧壁峰值时间延迟(SLD)、心底2腔或4腔峰值时间的最大差值(MaxDiff)以及12个心底和室壁中层峰值时间的标准差(Ts-SD)进行了比较。

结果

阳性和阴性对照组之间XCD和Ts-SD有显著差异(均P≤0.0001)。SLD和MaxDiff在阳性和阴性对照组之间无差异。在区分阳性和阴性对照组方面,XCD和Ts-SD优于SLD和MaxDiff(通过受试者工作特征比较,均P<0.01)。XCD、SLD、MaxDiff和Ts-SD在阴性对照组中分别显示不同步的比例为0%、50%、58%和50%。XCD是阳性对照组再同步治疗后唯一降低的参数(从160±88毫秒降至69±61毫秒,P=0.003)。

结论

在区分左心室不同步患者与功能正常患者方面,XCD优于现有参数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验